Surajit Sarkar vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: Swatanter Kumar, Madan B Lokur
04 December, 2012·Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The principal issues before us are whether a cryptic telephonic intimation given to the police can be described as a First Information Report for the purposes of Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure; whether the testimony of PW-7 Sanatan Sarkar and PW-8 Achintya Sarkar can be a...
Supreme Court Of India
Jayesh Dhanesh Goragandhi vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai & Ors
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra
04 December, 2012·K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question that has come up for consideration before us is whether after framing a Town Planning Scheme and the final scheme brought into force, after reserving plots for public purposes, providing compensation under Chapter V of the Maharashtra Page...
Supreme Court Of India
Sasikumar & Anr vs State Of Kerala
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
04 December, 2012·1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1987 OF 2012 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.) NO.2025 OF 2012) SASIKUMAR & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF KERALA RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T Aftab Alam, J.1. Leave granted.2. Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Jeetu @ Jitendera & Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra
04 December, 2012·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the High Court of Chattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 639 of 2009 whereby the High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant for o...
Supreme Court Of India
Jayesh Dhanesh Goragandhi vs Munincipal Corp.Of Gr.Mumbai and ...
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra
04 December, 2012·K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question that has come up for consideration before us is whether after framing a Town Planning Scheme and the final scheme brought into force, after reserving plots for public purposes, providing compensation under Chapter V of the Maharashtra Regional ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Gujarat and Anr vs Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji ...
Judges: B S Chauhan, Fakkir Mohamed Kalifulla
04 December, 2012·Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar & Agriculture are the appellants. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dated 11.10.2000 and the final order of the Division Bench dated 20.10.2000 passe...
Supreme Court Of India
N.V.Subba Rao vs State,Insp.Of ...
Judges: P Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi
03 December, 2012·P.Sathasivam,J.1) These appeals are directed against the common final judgment and order dated 29.01.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal Nos. 602 and 617 of 2001 respectively whereby the High Court while dismissing the appeals confirmed the ord...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of India And Another vs Ms Minshu Saxena And Another
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
03 December, 2012·1. This appeal is directed against order dated 13.1.2012 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.37121 of 2011. The operative portion of the High Court’s order reads as under:“In the result, the petition succeeds and is allowed. The order relating to disc...
Supreme Court Of India
Milan Krishna Roy & Anr vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: H L Dattu, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
03 December, 2012·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.3. Vide order dated 16th January, 2012, while issuing notice, this Court has ordered that :“,,,,,Meanwhile, petitioners shall not be arrested. ”4. In the facts and circumstances of the case and having gone through the reco...
Supreme Court Of India
Anitha Kamath vs M/S Vishwa Kutumb & Anr
Judges: H L Dattu, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
03 December, 2012·1. Ms. Anitha Shenoy, learned counsel represents the appellant, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, learned counsel represents respondent no.1 and Mrs. K.V.Bharti Upadhyay, learned counsel represents respondent no.2.2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties to the lis and also perused th...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.