Commnr. Of Cent. Excise, N.D vs M/S.Bharat Foam Udyog P.Ltd
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, H L Dattu, Deepak Verma
20 September, 2011·Learned counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Central Excise submits that this appeal is fully covered by a judgment of this Court in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Meerut vs. Maruti Foam (P) Ltd., 2004 (6) SCC 722. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, this appeal is d...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, New Delhi : vs : M/S Bharat Foam Udyot Pvt Ltd
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, H L Dattu, Deepak Verma
20 September, 2011·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7634 OF 1999 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI Appellant(s) :VERSUS:M/S. BHARAT FOAM UDYOT PVT. LTD. Respondent(s) O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Central Excise submits that...
Supreme Court Of India
V.G.N.Enterprises ... vs M/S Dunlop India Limited and Anr
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
20 September, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. These appeals emanate from the judgment and order dated 24.4.2008 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal R.C. No. 99 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008.3. Admittedly, the suit bearing O.S. No.430 of 2004, filed by the appellant, is pending before the District Munsif Court, Ambatt...
Supreme Court Of India
Vsg N Enterprises Through Vsn Devadoss : vs : M/S Dunlop India Limited & Anr
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
20 September, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. These appeals emanate from the judgment and order dated 24.4.2008 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal R.C. No. 99 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008.3. Admittedly, the suit bearing O.S. No.430 of 2004, filed by the appellant, is pending before the District Munsif Court, Ambatt...
Supreme Court Of India
Machavarapu Srinivasa Rao And Another vs The Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali, Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi, H L Dattu
19 September, 2011·G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether respondent No.1 – the Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali, Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority had the jurisdiction to grant permission to respondent No.3 – Sri Venkateswara Swamivari Alaya ...
Supreme Court Of India
D M Nagaraja vs The Government Of Karnataka & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
19 September, 2011·P.Sathasivam,J.1) Leave granted.2) The appellant has filed this appeal against the final judgment and order dated 28.03.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in a writ of Habeas Corpus being Writ Petition No. 220 of 2010 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed agai...
Supreme Court Of India
Rakesh & Another vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
19 September, 2011·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal Nos. 518 and 890 of 1997.2. Facts as explained by the prosecution have been that:A. On 5.3.1996, on the day of `Holi’ a...
Supreme Court Of India
Shivlal & Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
19 September, 2011·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 25.8.2006 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.973 of 2000, wherein the High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence, so far as the present appellants are concerned, awa...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P & Ors — vs Premlal Shrivas —
Judges:
19 September, 2011·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th January, 2002 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench, in Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2001. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has allowed the writ petition preferred by the respondent, directi...
Supreme Court Of India
Machavarapu Srinivasa Rao And Anr vs Vijayawada,Mangalagiri Urban ...
Judges: G S Singhvi, H L Dattu
19 September, 2011·G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether respondent No.1 - the Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali, Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority had the jurisdiction to grant permission to respondent No.3- Sri Venkateswara Swamivari Alaya Nirmana C...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.