Santosh Kumar Singh vs State Thr Cbi
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·[REPORTABLE] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2007 Santosh Kumar Singh ….Appellant Versus State thr. CBI …Respondent J U D G M E N T HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.This appeal arises out of the following facts:1. The deceased, Pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Institute Of Sales Technology Through Its Manager vs R Ayya Nadar Karthik
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Two issues have been decided by the High Court: (i) that the complaint was within limitation and (ii) that the question of jurisdiction was a matter of trial and should be taken by the parties at that stage.The learned counsel for the appellant has...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan vs Rameshwar Dayal & Anr
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. We find that the judgment of acquittal recorded by the High Court is based on an appreciation of the evidence and the positive finding is that the two eye witnesses P.Ws. 1 and 3 were not present. For arriving at this conclusion, the Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahesh Subashchandra Sindagi vs State Of Goa & Anr
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·1. Appellant at the relevant time was posted as Junior Telecom Officer at the Calangute Telephone Exchange Goa and according to the prosecution PW.1, Francis M. D’Souza (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’) had applied on 6th April, 1999 for shifting of his telephone connection from ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bikramaditya Singh vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·1. This appeal arises from an order dated 26th August, 2003, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 477 of 1999, where by the conviction of the appellant under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of imprisonment for life passed by the Third Additional...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Kumar Bajaj vs State Of Punjab & Anr
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 266 OF 2004 VIJAY KUMAR BAJAJ .. APPELLANT(S) vs.STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R We have perused the counter affidavit filed by the State of Punjab and para 6 of the preliminary objecti...
Supreme Court Of India
Bikramadita Singh vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
06 October, 2010·1. This appeal arises from an order dated 26th August, 2003, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 477 of 1999, where by the conviction of the appellant under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of imprisonment for life passed by the Third Additional...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Chander Talwar & Anr vs Devender Kumar Talwar & Ors
Judges: Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
06 October, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1684 OF 2004 RAM CHANDER TALWAR & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS DEVENDER KUMAR TALWAR & ORS. RESPONDENTS O R D E R Heard counsel appearing for the appellants.Appellant no.1, who was the nominee in th...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Chemplast Sanmar Limited vs C Arivu
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
05 October, 2010·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 340 OF 2009 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2544 OF 2007 M/S CHEMPLAST SANMAR LIMITED ..... PETITIONER VERSUS C. ARIVU ..... RESPONDENT O R D E R It is stated before us by the learned...
Supreme Court Of India
Athesham Ali vs State Of Bihar ( Presently Jharkhand )
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
05 October, 2010·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 5th August, 2003, whereby the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court on the appellant under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code has been maintained.2. The prosecution story is as under:2.1 P.W...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.