Moolchand Kharati Ram Hospital K. ... vs Labour Commissioner And Ors.
Judges: S R Babu, D Mohapatra
19 September, 2000·ORDER S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. A reference was made to the Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act and the following question was referred:Whether the workmen shown in Annexure 'A' are entitled to wages for the lockout period w.e.f. February 11, 1995 and, if so, what direct...
Supreme Court Of India
M. Sreenivasulu Reddy vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
18 September, 2000·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik and U.C. Banerjee, JJ.1. Applications for impleadment are allowed.2. These Special Leave Applications have been filed by the accused against whom offence under Sections 420 and 409 IPC read with Section 120B IPC has been alleged.3. The accused moved for grant of anticipatory bai...
Supreme Court Of India
Navin M. Raheja vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, R Lahoti, B Kumar
18 September, 2000·1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 47/ 1998, Shri Navin M. Raheja, who is present in person has submitted a note containing suggestions for protection of tigers. This note has been prepared as a result of discussions held at the meeting of the Steering Committee convened for the purpose.2. Learn...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs Panama Chemicals Works
Judges: B Kirpal, R Pal
15 September, 2000·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. After hearing the learned Counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that a question of law did arise. We, therefore, direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following question of law to the High Court: Whether on the facts and in the c...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Panama Chemicals Works
Judges: B Kirpal, R Pal
15 September, 2000·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that a question of law did arise. We, therefore, direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following question of law to the High Court (see [2000] 245 ITR 684, 685): "Whethe...
Supreme Court Of India
K.L. Narasimha Rao vs State Of A.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Rao, S V Patil
15 September, 2000·ORDER M.J. Rao and S.V. Patil, JJ.1. Leave granted.The appellant, who was working as a Village Officer, before the abolition of the hereditary village offices, was suspended from service in 1976 and ultimately removed on 25.12.1978. There was also a criminal case in connection with an incident in wh...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Haryana And Ors. vs Harbans Lal And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
15 September, 2000·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik and U.C. Banerjee, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The direction of the High Court granting relief in favour of JBT teachers for the State of Haryana is the subject matter of challenge in these appeals. The High Court appears to have followed the earlier decision of this Court in the cas...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. And Anr. vs U.P. Excise Subordinate O.M. ...
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
14 September, 2000·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik and U.C. Banerjee, JJ.1.The State of Uttar Prades the appellant, assailing the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 20th November, 1996 on the Writ Petition filed by the Excise Clerks in the subordinate offices. Before the High Court, the clerks of the subordinate offices ...
Supreme Court Of India
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: M J Rao, M Shah
14 September, 2000·1. Subsequent to the order passed by this Court permitting the petitioner to file an interlocutory application, this interlocutory application has been filed. Recently, this Court has held that interlocutory applications if there are in substance in the nature of review applications, they should not...
Supreme Court Of India
Cranex Ltd And Anr vs Nagarjuna Finance Ltd And Anr
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, M B Shah
14 September, 2000·ï»¿CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 789 of 2000 PETITIONER:CRANEX LTD. AND ANR.RESPONDENT:NAGARJUNA FINANCE LTD. AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/09/2000 BENCH:M. JAGANNADHA RAO & M.B. SHAH JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 Supp(3) SCR 300 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave granted. The case involves a s...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.