Chittoor Zilla Vyavasayadarula ... vs A.P. State Electricity Board and ...
Judges: N Santosh Hegde
03 November, 2000·MISRA, J.L...I...T.T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......J Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.The questions raised in these appeals are:(a) Whether the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) is competent to put an end to the policy decision of...
Supreme Court Of India
Chittoor Zilla Vyavasayadarula Sangham vs A P State Electricity Board & Ors ! Rythu Samakhyavs Govt Of A P & Ors
Judges: N Santosh Hegde
03 November, 2000·PETITIONER:CHITTOOR ZILLA VYAVASAYADARULA SANGHAM Vs. RESPONDENT:A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.!Rythu SamakhyaVs.Govt. of A.P. & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/11/2000 BENCH:N. Santosh Hegde.JUDGMENT:MISRA, J. L...I...T.T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. J Leave granted in all the special...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Lloyd Insulation (I.) (P.) Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, Y Sabharwal, B Agrawal
03 November, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The notice on the special leave petitions stated that the matter might be disposed of at this stage by setting aside the order under challenge and directing the High Court to call for a reference of the questions that were proposed by the Revenue.3. The questions that were propos...
Supreme Court Of India
Sakshi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal, K Thomas
03 November, 2000·ORDER Crl. M.P. 792/20001. No orders at this stage.W.P. (Crl.) 33/97 & SLP (Crl) 1672-1673/20002. Learned Counsel for the petitioner in the tagged special leave petition Nos. 1672- 1673/2000 is granted six weeks' time to file rejoinder.3. Keeping in view the importance of the issues involved and far...
Supreme Court Of India
Branch Manager, State Bank Of ... vs Abdul Raheem And Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, D Mohapatra
03 November, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. An industrial dispute was raised by the first respondent before the Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent') by which a question as to whether his termination of service was justified or not was referred to. The case put forth by the respondent is that he...
Supreme Court Of India
The Management Of M/S Indian Iron & Steel Co Ltd vs Prahlad Singh
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Shivaraj V Patil
03 November, 2000·PETITIONER:THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. INDIAN IRON & STEEL CO. LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:PRAHLAD SINGH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/11/2000 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu, & Shivaraj V. Patil.JUDGMENT: L...........T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. J Shivaraj V. Patil,J. Leave granted.In this appeal the appellant is...
Supreme Court Of India
P G I Of M E & vs Research Raj Kumar
Judges: U C Banerjee, K G Balakrishna
02 November, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6576 of 1999 PETITIONER:P.G.I.OF M.E. & RESEARCH, CHANDIGARH Vs. RESPONDENT:RAJ KUMAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/11/2000 BENCH:U.C.Banerjee, K.G.Balakrishna JUDGMENT:BANERJEE, J. L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J The Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Educ...
Supreme Court Of India
G M, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd, West Bengal vs Shib Kumar Dushad & Ors
Judges: M B Shah, D P Mohapatra
02 November, 2000·PETITIONER:G.M., BHARAT COKING COAL LTD., WEST BENGAL Vs. RESPONDENT:SHIB KUMAR DUSHAD & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/11/2000 BENCH:M.B. SHAH, & D.P. MOHAPATRA, JUDGMENT:D.P.MOHAPATRA, J.Leave granted. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J We have heard learned counsel for the pa...
Supreme Court Of India
Coal India Ltd. And Ors. vs Mahatha Traders And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, B Kumar
02 November, 2000·1. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, we are of the view that there is no merit in this appeal. It appears that an agreement was entered into between the parties whereby the appellants were to supply sink coal/rejected coal to the respondents according to notice dated 9th February, 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Sail And Anr. vs Awadhesh Singh And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
02 November, 2000·1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition Nos. 6580-6581 of 1999.2. The respondents in C.A. Nos. 3797-3800/99 have been set ex parte as they chose not to appear notwithstanding due service of notice. An I.A. has been filed on their behalf which is taken on board. The order treating them ex parte is...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.