Shri Dilip K. Basu vs State Of West Bengal and Ors.
Judges: A A S, V Khare
29 January, 1999·1. We have perused the compliance affidavits and the comparative chart prepared by the learned Amicus:State of Tamil Nadu2. It appears that all the directions issued in D.K. Basu's case are being complied with.State of Gujarat3. Ms. H. Wahi, learned Counsel for the State of Gujarat submits that she ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagriti Upbhogta Kalyan Parishad ... vs U O I and Ors.
Judges: A A S, B Kirpal, V Khare
29 January, 1999·1. Mr. Rajinder Sachhar, learned Senior counsel has placed on record a certificate signed by Dr. J.M. Dua of Indraprastha Apollo Hospital dated 28.1.99.2. The learned Additional Solicitor General, who appears on behalf of the C.B.I. has produced the record of the case before us. From a cursory look ...
Supreme Court Of India
Muthumanickam and Anr. vs Sekaran
Judges: G Nanavati, A Misra
29 January, 1999·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.4. The appellant applied under Section 125 of the CrPC for maintenance on the ground that the respondent has neglected to maintain her and their child. The Trial Court believed that the appellant and the respondent a...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Ganges Waterproof Works (P) ... vs Union Of India
Judges: S V Manohar, R Lahoti
29 January, 1999·ORDER R.C. Lahoti, J.1. The disputes arising between the parties out of a contract entered into in the year 1978 were referred for arbitration consistently with the arbitration clause in the agreement. The Arbitrator gave an award on 23rd August, 1982. Proceedings under Sections 14/17 of the Indian ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Marshall Sons & Co ( I ) Ltd vs M/S Sahi Oretrans ( P ) Ltd And Anr
Judges: G B Pattanaik, M B Shah
29 January, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S. MARSHALL SONS & CO.(I) LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S.SAHI ORETRANS (P) LTD. AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/01/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT: DER Leave granted.This appeal has been filed under the following circumstances. The present appellant had obtained a decree for evict...
Supreme Court Of India
Purshottam Eknath Nemade vs D.N. Mahajan and Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, D Mohapatra
28 January, 1999·ORDER Rajendra Babu, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order made by the Bar Council of India in its disciplinary jurisdiction on three accusations against the appellant who is an advocate. However, on the first two accusations the appellant was exonerated and there being no appeal against the same ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohan Balaku Patil and Ors. vs Krishnoji Bhaurao Hundre (Dead) ...
Judges: S Bharucha, S R Babu
28 January, 1999·ORDER Rajendra Babu, J.1. The appellants before us made a claim for registration of occupancy rights under Section 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] before the Land Tribunal in a proceeding initiated under Section 48-A of the Act. The Tribunal by an or...
Supreme Court Of India
Regional Manager, Bank Of Baroda vs The Presiding Officer, Central ...
Judges: S Majmudar, S Phukan
28 January, 1999·ORDER S.B. Majmudar, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the appellant-Bank has brought in challenge the judgment and order rendered by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissing the appellant's writ petition against an order passed by the Presiding Officer, Centra...
Supreme Court Of India
Veena Hasmukh Jain And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, S Rajendra Babu
28 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 302 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. The question raised for consideration in these appeals is identical as to the duty payable under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 on an agreement for sale of flats covered by the Maharashtra Owner-ship Flats (Regulation...
Supreme Court Of India
Eicher Motors Ltd. And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc
Judges: S P Bharucha, K Venkataswami, S Rajendra Babu
28 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 295 The Judgment was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J.RAJENDRA BABU, J. -In these petitions, the validity and application of the Scheme, as modified by introduction to Rule 57-F [read as 57-F(4-A)] of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, under which credit which was lying unuti...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.