Allahabad Bank vs Shri Prem Singh
Judges: Kirpal B N J
09 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T KIRPAL, J.The appellant bank had requisitioned applications for appointment as cashiers or cash clerks from amongst Ex- servicemen through the District Soldiers, Sailors and Army Board, Delhi. Thereafter on 13th June, 1977 the respondent was appointed by the appellant at its Lajpat N...
Supreme Court Of India
Joint Secretary To The Home Department , Madras & Ors vs R Ramalingam
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J Jeevan Reddy, B P J Paripoornan, K S J Act Headnote
09 September, 1996·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:LAXMAN GAJANAN DESAI & ANR. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/03/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (4) 223 1996 SCALE (3)392 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:WITH CIVIL APPEAL N0S.6747,6744-46, 6748-50 of 1996 (Aris...
Supreme Court Of India
Joint Secretary To The Home Department , Madras & Ors vs R Ramalingam
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J Jeevan Reddy, B P J Paripoornan, K S J Act Headnote
09 September, 1996·PETITIONER:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE HOME DEPARTMENT, MADRAS & ORS.Vs.RESPONDENT: R.RAMALINGAM DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1996 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) PARIPOORNAN, K.S.(J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R This appeal arises from an order of a learned Single...
Supreme Court Of India
F B Taraporawala And Others Etc Etc vs Bayer India Ltd And Others
Judges: Kuldip Singh, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
09 September, 1996·PETITIONER:F.B. TARAPORAWALA AND OTHERS ETC.ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:BAYER INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1996 BENCH:KULDIP SINGH, B.L HANSARIA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:HANSARIA. J.J U D G M E N T Industrial growth, yes; but by exposing a large segment of society to the risk of losing liv...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs The Industrial Development ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
06 September, 1996·O R D E R In view of the concurrent order this appeal has to be allowed and the writ petition has appeal has to be dismissed. The order of the Division Bench is set aside and the order of the learned Single Judge stands restored. Consequently the appeal is allowed with costs quantified at Rs.10,000/...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs The Industrial Development and ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
06 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T S.B. MAJMUDAR, J.I have gone through the judgment prepared by my esteemed learned Brother K. Ramaswamy, J. I respectfully agree with the conclusion to the effect that respondents nos. 1 and 2 had missed the bus by adopting an indolent attitude in not challenging the acquisition proce...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs Hira Lal And Others
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
06 September, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.Heard the counsel for the parties.We are of opinion that the learned District Judge who heard the appeal filed by the State and the cross- objections filed by the respondents was not competent to award solatium and interest as per provisions of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (...
Supreme Court Of India
N. Rajarathinam vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
06 September, 1996·O R D E R Delay condoned.This special leave petition has been filed against an order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, made an February 26, 1996 in Da No.2152 of 1991. The petitioner, while working as Assistant commissioner of Commercial Taxes, demanded and accepted illegal gr...
Supreme Court Of India
Navaneethammal vs Arjuna Chetty
Judges: N P Singh, K Venkataswami
06 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T The plaintiff Who filed a suit on 13.6.1962 for declaration of her title to the suit property and for recovery of possession is the appellant herein. The suit property is an extent of 1.13 acre out of 3.39 acres in Survey No. 330/2 in Ulli Village, Gudiyatham Taluk. North Arcot Distr...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of ... vs The Industrial Development ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
06 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy, J.This appeal by Special leave arises from the judgment and order dated July 14, 1988 in Appeal No. 120 of 1988 of the Bombay High Court reversing the judgement and order of the learned Single Judge and quashing the award passed under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.