Dr. Y. Ibehaibi Devi (D) By Lrs. vs The State Of Manipur Represented ...
Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, Aniruddha Bose
31 March, 2022·Leave granted.2. The appellants before us are eight retired Assistant Professors and a College Librarian, also superannuated, from the State of Manipur. All of them had superannuated between 28 th February 2006 and 31st July 2008. Subsequent to filing of the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal, ele...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohit Bathla vs Central Goods And Service Tax
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
31 March, 2022·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM-M No.8190 of 2021 (Q&M).3. The appellant was taken in custody on 25.12.2020 in connection with crime registered pursuant to complaint dated 24.02.2021 for the off...
Supreme Court Of India
Pattali Makkal Katchi vs A Mayilerumperumal & Ors ( S )
Judges: L Nageswara Rao, B R Gavai
31 March, 2022·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCivil Appeal No. 2600 of 2022 (@ SLP (Civil) No.19574 of 2021)ReportablePATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI.... Appellant(s)VersusA. MAYILERUMPERUMAL & ORS.With…. Respondent (s)Civil Appeal No. 2601 of 2022 (@ SLP (Civil) No. 19378 of 2021) Civil Appeal N...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr Y Ibehaibi Devi ( D ) By Lrs & Ors vs The State Of Manipur Represented By The Commissioner ( Higher And Technical Education ) Government Of Manipur & Anr
Judges: Vineet Saran, Aniruddha Bose
31 March, 2022·Leave granted.2. The appellants before us are eight retired Assistant Professors and a College Librarian, also superannuated, from the State of Manipur. All of them had superannuated between 28th February 2006 and 31st July 2008. Subsequent to filing of the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal, ele...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohit Bathla vs Central Goods And Service Tax, Division Panipat, Cgst Commissionerate, Panchkula
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
31 March, 2022·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM-M No.8190 of 2021 (Q&M).3. The appellant was taken in custody on 25.12.2020 in connection with crime registered pursuant to complaint dated 24.02.2021 for the off...
Supreme Court Of India
Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation vs Sanjay Gajanan Gharat And Another
Judges: L Nageswara Rao, B R Gavai
31 March, 2022·B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.2. Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “KDM Corporation”) and the State of Maharashtra, by way of the present appeals, challenge the correctness of the judgment dated 6th April 2021, pa...
Supreme Court Of India
Nadakerappa Since Deceased By Lrs & Ors vs Pillamma Since Deceased By Lrs & Ors
Judges: S Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari
31 March, 2022·S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.(1) These appeals are directed against the judgment dated SIGN 30.12.2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.1563 of 2007 connected with Writ Appeal No.1950 of 2007.(2) The brief facts necessary for the dispo...
Supreme Court Of India
P Nazeer Etc vs Salafi Trust & Anr Etc
Judges: Hemant Gupta, V Ramasubramanian
30 March, 2022·V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.1. Aggrieved by a common Judgment delivered by the High Court of Kerala in two Civil Revision Petitions filed under the proviso to sub section (9) of Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995, reversing the judgment of the Waqf Tribunal and decreeing the suit of the respondents in SIGN ...
Supreme Court Of India
Haryana Urban Development ... vs M/S. Mehta Construction Company
Judges: Ajay Rastogi, Sanjiv Khanna
30 March, 2022·Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The appellant before us – Haryana Urban Development Authority, Karnal, Haryana, and the respondent – M/s. Mehta Construction Company, on 6th July 1998, had entered into an agreement whereby the respondent was to construct water body, water body fall, pedestrian bridg...
Supreme Court Of India
Shripati Lakhu Mane vs The Member Secretary Maharashtra ...
Judges: Hemant Gupta, V Ramasubramanian
30 March, 2022·V. Ramasubramanian1. The plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money has come up with the above appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a regular appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by which the decree granted by the Trial Court...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.