Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari vs The State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M M Sundresh
11 July, 2022·SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. Crime and punishment is something which has agitated the judicial minds. Punishment cannot be disproportionately high or low. It should not be oppressive, but should serve the purpose of deterrence against crimes in a society along with a sense of justice to the victim and t...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Nagaland & Ors vs Nishevi Achumi
Judges: M R Shah, B V Nagarathna
11 July, 2022·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4223 of 2022 The State of Nagaland & Ors. Appellants Versus Nishevi Achumi …Respondent J U D G M E N T M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Judg...
Supreme Court Of India
Hemantha Kumar vs R Mahadevaiah & Ors
Judges: M R Shah, Nagarathna
11 July, 2022·M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Petition No. 35073 of 2015 by which the High Court has set aside the consent decree passed in the Lok Adalat and consequently has restored the original s...
Supreme Court Of India
S Chandrasekharan & Ors vs M Dinakar & Anr
Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, Aniruddha Bose
11 July, 2022·ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.Leave granted.2. The appellants before us are the claimants in an action for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (1988 Act). An accident had occurred on 28th February 2011 at about 10:45 A.M., which resulted in death of one Bala Babitha, a 37 year old lady, and caused...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs M/S Nemichand Damodardas & Anr
Judges: M R Shah, Nagarathna
11 July, 2022·M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur Bench in First Appeal No.1302 of 2009 by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the original owners/original claimants and ...
Supreme Court Of India
The Principal Secretary , Revenue Department , State Of Telangana & Anr vs B Rangaswamy ( Dead ) By Lrs & Ors
Judges: Indira Banerjee, A S Bopanna
11 July, 2022·A.S. Bopanna,J.SIGN Leave granted.2. The Appellants-State of Telangana through its Principal Secretary as appellant No.1 and District Collector as appellant No.2 are before this Court in the Appeal bearing No.4669/2022 (arising out of SLP 6898/2021), assailing the judgment dated 01.04.2021 passed by...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Sales Tax Odisha And Ors vs M/S Essel Mining And Industries Ltd And Anr
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
11 July, 2022·1. The Five Special Leave Petitions arising from the orders of the High Court of Orissa are taken up for hearing on pure questions of law.2. The questions arise in the context of Section 42(6) of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 20041. The first question is whether the power of the Commissioner to al...
Supreme Court Of India
Securities And Exchange Board Of India A Ppellant vs Sunil Krishna Khaitan And Others R E Spondents
Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, Bela M Trivedi
11 July, 2022·SANJIV KHANNA, J.This common judgment would decide the aforesaid two appeals preferred by the Securities and Exchange Board of India1, whereby it has challenged the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal2 dated 19th June 2013 in Appeal No. 23 of 2013 titled ‘Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others v. S...
Supreme Court Of India
Sriram Housing Finance And ... vs Omesh Misra Memorial Charitable ...
Judges: Hon Apos Ble Ms Banerjee, J K Maheshwari
06 July, 2022·J.K. Maheshwari, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 16.04.2014 passed by High Court of Delhi in C.M. (M) No.493 of 2012, preferred by appellant company herein under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the order dated 13.01.2012 passed in Execution Petiti...
Supreme Court Of India
Neilan International Co. Ltd. vs Powerica Limited
Judges: Hon Apos Ble Ms Banerjee, J K Maheshwari
06 July, 2022·1. The Petitioner has filed the present Transfer Petition seeking the transfer of Comm. A. S. No.09/2019 filed by Respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) before the CCH83 LXXII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) at Bengaluru, Karnata...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.