Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr vs State Of U P & Anr
Judges: Indira Banerjee, A S Bopanna
20 April, 2022·Indira Banerjee, J.This special leave petition is against a final judgment and order dated 7th March 2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, dismissing the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 being case No.29704 of 2...
Supreme Court Of India
Nagendra vs Ashok And Anr
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, K M Joseph
20 April, 2022·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.463 OF 2022 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1341 OF 2021 NAGENDRA …Petitioner versus ASHOK AND ANR. …Respondents O R D E R The order passed by the Trial Court decreei...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Gitashree Dutta ( Dey )Law Or Is In Public Interest , The Plea Of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Be Sustained In Punjab Communications Ltd vs Union Of India And Ors 1 This Court Held That Policy Decision Creating The Legitimate Expectation Which Is Normally Binding On The Decision Maker , Can Be Changed By The Decision Maker In Overriding Public Interest It Was Held As Under : “37 The Above Survey Of Cases Shows That The Doc Trine Of Legitimate ExpectationMay Give Rise To Judi Cial Review But The Granting Of Relief Is Very Much Limited [Vide : Union Of India vs Hindustan Devel OpmentIn Union Of India vs Lt Col P K Choudhary3 , This Court Held That The Legitimate Expectation , As An Argument , Cannot Prevail Overvs Lt Col P K Choudhary3 , This Court Held That The Legitimate Expectation , As An Argument , Cannot Prevail Over The Policy Introduced By The Government Which Does Not Suffer From Any Perversity , Unfairness Or Unreasonableness Or Which Does Not Violate Any Fundamental Or Other Enforceable Rights VestedPublic Interest Wherein Other More Important Considerations May Outweigh What Would Otherwise Have Been The Legitimate Expectation Of The Claimant In Food Corporation Of India vs M/S Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries4 , This Court Has Pointed Out As Under : “8 The Mere Reasonable Or Legitimate Expectation Of A Citizen ,For Distribution Of Essential Commodities To The Ration Card Holders 20 This Court In Swaraj Abhiyan vs Union Of India & Ors 5 Has Held That The 2013 Act Is A Social Welfare Legislation And Its Provisions Are Mandatory It Is Held Thus : “42 The Provisions In The Nfs Act Mentioned Above Are Mandatory And Yet Almost Four Years Down The Line They Have Not Been Fully Implemented By Some States Xxxxx 44 These Questions Have Been Troubling Us Since This Matter Was Listed On 24102016 Subsequent To Our Order Dated 1352016 In Swaraj Abhiyan23 This Court In Sarkari Sasta Anaj Vikreta Sangh vs State Of M P 6 Has Held That No Person Can Claim A Right To Run A Fair Price Shop As An Agent Of The GovernmentA Statute 25 It Is Trite Law That There Can Be No Estoppel Against A Statute This Court Has Settled This Principle In A Catena Of Judgments , 15 Starting As Early As 1955 A Constitution Bench Of This Court In Thakur Amar Singhji vs State Of Rajasthan7 Held As Follows : “ We Are Unable On These Facts To See Any Basis For A Plea Of Estoppel The Letter DatedNo Estoppel Against A Statue” 26 A Constitution Of Bench Of This Court In Electronics Corpn Of India Ltd vs Secy Revenue Deptt , Govt Of A P 8 Also Upheld This Principle And Held As Follows : “21 There Are Two Short Answers To This Contention In The First Place
Judges: S Abdul Nazeer, Vikram Nath
20 April, 2022·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO. 4254 OF 2022(Arising out of S.L.P. (C.) No. 30438 of 2019) THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS GITASHREE DUTTA (DEY) …RESPONDENT(S)J U D G M E N TS. ABDUL N...
Supreme Court Of India
Shankar Lal vs Hindustan Copper Ltd & Ors
Judges: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Aniruddha Bose
20 April, 2022·ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.The appellant is before us primarily questioning the validity of an order of the employer (Hindustan Copper Limited the first respondent in this appeal) treating his date of birth as 21st September 1945. This date has relevance for computation of his benefits ac...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Odisha & Ors Etc Etc vs Sulekh Chandra Pradhan Etc Etc
Judges: L Nageswara Rao, B R Gavai
20 April, 2022·B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants – State of Odisha and others have approached this Court, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 20th December, 2018, delivered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in a batch of writ petitions being Wri...
Supreme Court Of India
Sh Ram Chander ( Dead ) Thr Lrs ( S ) vs Union Of India ( S )
Judges: M R Shah, B V Nagarathna
20 April, 2022·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION` CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 29262927 OF 2022 SH. RAM CHANDER (DEAD) THR LRS ..Appellant (S) Versus UNION OF INDIA ..Respondent (S) With CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2928 OF 2022 J U D G M E N T M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeli...
Supreme Court Of India
Hyundai Motor India Limited vs Shailendra Bhatnagar
Judges: Vineet Saran, Aniruddha Bose
20 April, 2022·ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant are manufacturers of vehicles and the present SIGN appeal arises out of a complaint made by the respondent concerning defect in a vehicle, particularly in relation to its safety features originating from the appellant, of the model Cr...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Kumar Upadhyay vs The Director General, Ssb And Others
Judges: M R Shah, Nagarathna
20 April, 2022·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2707 OF 2022 Anil Kumar Upadhyay … Appellant Versus The Director General, SSB and Others … Respondents J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied wit...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr ( Mrs ) Chanda Rani Akhouri & Ors vs Dr M A Methusethupathi & Ors
Judges: Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S Oka
20 April, 2022·Rastogi, J.1. The sad demise of husband of appellant no.1 after his long illness on 3rd February, 1996 has resulted in initiation of the legal proceedings at the instance of appellant no.1 along with her children SIGN on a bona fide belief that the cause of death of her late husband was post operati...
Supreme Court Of India
U P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Through Housing Commissioner vs Ram Singh ( D ) Th Lrs & Ors
Judges: K M Joseph, Hrishikesh Roy
20 April, 2022·K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Permission to file SLP(C) Nos. 23899-23900 of 2017 is granted.Delay condoned.Leave granted.2. These appeals have behind them a chequered history. It all (hereinafter referred to as the “Adhiniyam”) on 10.11.1973. The said Notification is to be treated as equivalent to a Notificatio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.