Anapurna Jaiswal vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd And Ors
Judges: K M Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
30 September, 2021·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6119 OF 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.36767 OF 2016) ANAPURNA JAISWAL APPELLANT(s) VERSUS INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Leave granted.2....
Supreme Court Of India
Delhi Development Authority vs Gaurav Kumar & Ors
Judges: Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S Oka
30 September, 2021·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) D.NO. 1141 OF 2018 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 10066 OF 2018 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6179 OF 2017 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER(S) VERSUS GAURAV KUMAR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Delay cond...
Supreme Court Of India
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Sushil Kumar Godara
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi
30 September, 2021·S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the appeal. The appellant (hereby “insurer”) questions the judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi1 ("hereafter the NCDRC"). In the impugned order, the NCDRC ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr vs Chandra Prakash Jain & Anr
Judges: L Nageswara Rao, B R Gavai, B V Nagarathna
30 September, 2021·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCivil Appeal No.4222 of 2020ReportableRajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr.Versus Chandra Prakash Jain & Anr.J U D G M E N T .... Appellant(s) …. Respondent(s) L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. Respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India And Another vs Abhiram Verma
Judges: M R Shah
30 September, 2021·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1027 OF 2020 Union of India and another …Appellants Versus Abhiram Verma …Respondent J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the i...
Supreme Court Of India
Placido Francisco Pinto ( D ) By Lrs & Anr vs Jose Francisco Pinto & Anr
Judges: Hemant Gupta, V Ramasubramanian
30 September, 2021·HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The legal representatives of the plaintiff have appealed before this Court, aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court dated 6.7.2005 affirmed by the High Court in the Second Appeal on 16.8.2006.2. The plaintiff filed a suit1 (Special Civil Suit No. 55/77/I)...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India Ministry Of ... vs Trilok S. Bhandari
Judges: Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S Oka
29 September, 2021·Rastogi, J.1. Leave granted.2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th November, 2006 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand directing the present appellant to adjust the original Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2021.09.29 17:54:44 IS...
Supreme Court Of India
Munusamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu The Land ...
Judges: M R Shah, A S Bopanna
29 September, 2021·M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.07.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in AS No.1222 of 2001 by which the High Signature Not Verified Court has partly allowed the said appeal and has enhanced the Digitally signed by ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramgopal & Anr vs The State Of Madhya PradeshKrishnappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Surya Kant
29 September, 2021·Surya Kant, J.These two Criminal Appeals, No. 1489 of 2012 emanating from the judgment and order dated 27th November, 2009 of the High Court SIGN of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench and No. 1488 of 2012 arising out of judgment and order dated 9th January, 2009 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, tho...
Supreme Court Of India
Avtar Singh & Ors vs Bimla Devi & Ors
Judges: K M Joseph, S Ravindra Bhat
29 September, 2021·S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. Special leave granted. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the appeal which questions a judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court1.2. The relevant facts are that the property marked 'ABCD' in the site plan (produced along wit...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.