Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. July

Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India & Another ( S ) J U D G M E N T L Nageswara Rao ,As Amended By The Tribunal Reforms ( Rationalisation And Conditions Of Service ) OrdinanceOf The Constitution Of India Inasmuch As These Are Violative Of The Principles Of Separation Of Powers And Independence Of Judiciary, Apart From Being Contrary To The Principles Laid Down By This Court In Union Of India vs R Gandhi, President, Madras 1 | Pa Ge Bar Association1, Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr 2, Rojer Mathew vs South Indian Bank Limited & Ors 3 And Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr 4 The SeeksIndian Bank Limited & Ors 3 And Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr 4 The Seeks A Further Direction To No 2 For Establishment Of A Separate Wing To Cater To The Requirements Of Tribunals In India 2 A Brief Reference To The Historical Background Of Tribunalisation In This Country Is Necessary For A Better Appreciation Of The Dispute That Falls For Adjudication In This Writ The Statement Of Objects And Reasons For Insertion Of Articles 323-A And 323-B In The Constitution Of India By The Forty-Second Amendment Is As Follows : “To Reduce The Mounting ArrearsConstitution Of India By The Forty-Second Amendment Is As Follows : “To Reduce The Mounting Arrears In High Courts And To Secure The Speedy Disposal Of Service Matters, Revenue Matters And Certain Matters Of Special Importance In The Context Of The Socio-Economic Development And Progress, It Is Considered Expedient To Provide For Administrative And Other Tribunals For Dealing With Such Matters While Preserving The Jurisdiction Of The Supreme Court In Regard To Such Matters Under Articles 136 Of The Constitution It Is Also Necessary To Make Certain ModificationsHighConstitution It Is Also Necessary To Make Certain ModificationsVires Of The Administrative TribunalsWas Challenged In S P Sampath Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors 5 Before This Court The Main Ground Taken In The Writ Was That The Jurisdiction Of The HighMain Ground Taken