Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: Ashok Bhushan, M R Shah

07 December, 2020·ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.These Miscellaneous Applications have been filed in Civil Appeal No.11435 of 2018 decided by this Court vide judgment dated 28.11.2018. Civil Appeal No. 11435 of 2018 was filed against the common judgment dated 02.02.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the S...

Judges: L Nageswara Rao, Ajay Rastogi

07 December, 2020·Non-ReportableIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.3649–3650 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.20512-20513 of 2019)Vikesh Kumar Gupta & Anr. Appellant(s)VersusThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. …. Respondent (s) W I T HCivil Appeal Nos.3652-3657 of 2...

Judges: L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, Ajay Rastogi

03 December, 2020·HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The present appeals are directed against a common order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 09.04.2014 whereby the intra- Court appeals filed by the Punjab State Electricity Board were allowed 2 and the order of Learned Single Judge, allowing the writ petitions for the gran...

Judges: L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, Ajay Rastogi

03 December, 2020·HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The present appeals are directed against a common order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 09.04.2014 whereby the intra- Court appeals filed by the Punjab State Electricity Board were allowed and the order of Learned Single Judge, allowing the writ petitions for the grant ...

Judges: Ashok Bhushan

03 December, 2020·M.R. SHAH, J.SIGN Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 11.05.2020 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in M.Cr.C No. 49338/2019 and M.Cr.C. No. 49972/2019, the original petitioner as well as the State ...

Judges: Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy

03 December, 2020·M.R. SHAH, J.SIGN1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 14.09.2016/19.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2014, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the State and ha...

Judges: Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy

03 December, 2020·M.R. SHAH, J.1. Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 08.09.2020 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM­M No. 26304 of 2020, by which the application submitted by the appellant herein SIGN for anticipatory ...

Judges:

03 December, 2020·M.R. SHAH, J.1. Having heard the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant and the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the State, the delay caused in preferring the appeal is condoned. 1a. Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned SIGN judgment and ...

Judges: Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy, M R Shah

03 December, 2020·ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.SIGN The petitioner, an authorized agent, for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by State of Punjab has filed this writ petition impugning the definition of goods under Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and consequential notifications to the...

Judges: L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, Ajay Rastogi

03 December, 2020·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO(s).3904­3905 OF 2020(Arising out of SLP(C) No(s). 20553­20554 of 2013) PANKJESHWAR SHARMA AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) WITHC...