Mohammed Salim ( D ) Through Lrs & Ors vs Shamsudeen ( D ) Through Lrs & Ors
Judges: N V Ramana, Mohan M Shantanagoudar
22 January, 2019·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5158 OF 2013 MOHAMMED SALIM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. ..APPELLANTS VERSUS SHAMSUDEEN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.The judgment dated 05.09.2007 passed in S.A. No....
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Kerala And Anr vs Padalodiyil Mary Antony & Ors
Judges: S Abdul Nazeer, Deepak Gupta
22 January, 2019·S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment in M.F.A No. 1247 of 2000 dated 18.09.2007, whereby the High Court of Kerala has allowed the appeal while setting aside the order of the Forest Tribunal dated 22.07.2000 in O.A No. 46/99 filed by the respondents under Section 8 of th...
Supreme Court Of India
New Delhi Municipal Council Etc Etc vs Association Of Concerned Citizens Of New Delhi And Others Etc
Judges: A K Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
22 January, 2019·A.K. SIKRI, J.Leave granted.Introductory Remarks:SIGN2) These appeals are filed by New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the judgment dated August 10, 2017 rendered by High Court of Delhi in a batch of writ petitions which were filed by the persons who have their houses/properties in NDMC area....
Supreme Court Of India
Ramasamy ( Purchaser ) ( S ) vs Venkatachalapathi ( Decree Holder ) & Anr
Judges: R Banumathi, R Subhash Reddy
22 January, 2019·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2019 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 3608 OF 2017] J U D G M E N T R. BANUMATHI, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the Judgment and order dated 09.11.2016 passed by the High Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sau Saraswatibai vs Lalitabai & Ors
Judges: L Nageswara Rao, M R Shah
22 January, 2019·NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 118119 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 41524153 of 2014] Sau Saraswatibai .. Appellant Versus Lalitabai & Ors. .. Respondents J U D G M E N T M. R. Shah...
Supreme Court Of India
Rakesh Bakshi & Anr vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir & OrsState Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Harvinder Singh & Ors
Judges: Ashok Bhushan, K M Joseph
22 January, 2019·NON-REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NOS. 235-236 OF 2019(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.7843-7844 of 2014) RAKESH BAKSHI & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO. 237 OF 2019(Ar...
Supreme Court Of India
Nawaz vs The State Rep By Inspector Of Police
Judges: Mohan M Shantanagoudar, Dinesh Maheshwari
22 January, 2019·MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.The appellants herein were charged, tried and convicted for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter ‘IPC’). The High Court confirmed the judgment of conviction passed by the Trial Court and hence they...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Kerala And Anr vs Mohammed Basheer
Judges: S Abdul Nazeer, Deepak Gupta
22 January, 2019·S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.1. The appellant-State of Kerala has preferred these appeals challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court of Kerala in M.F.A. No.160 of 1991 dated 18.09.2001 and the order in RP No.572 of 2001 in M.F.A. No.160 of 1991 dated 06.02.2007.2. The re...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Kumar vs Union Of India And Ors Judgment Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Leave Granted The Was Aggrieved By The Rejection Of His Claim For Financial Upgradation By The Council For Scientific And Industrial Research ( “Csir” )Period In Order To Enable The Employee To Make A Representation For Upgradation The View Of The Court Was That Non-Communication Of Entries In The Acrs Has Civil Consequences Since It May Affect The Chances Of The Employee For Promotion And Other Benefits A Failure To Communicate Would Be Arbitrary This Court Held That These Directions Would Apply To Employees Of Statutory Authorities, Public Sector Corporations And Other Instrumentalities Of The State, In Addition To Government Servants A Three Judge Bench Of This Court Has In Sukhdev Singh vs Union Of India & OrsBench Of This Court Has In Sukhdev Singh vs Union Of India & Ors 2 Affirmed The Correctness Of The View Taken In Dev Dutt ( Supra ) Noting That An Earlier Three Judge Bench In Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar vs Union Of India & Ors 3 Had Adopted The Same Principle The Three Judge Bench In Sukhdev Singh ( Supra ), Held Thus : “8 In Our Opinion, The View Taken In Dev Dutt That Every Entry In Acr Of A Public Servant Must Be Communicated To Him/Her Within A Reasonable Period Is Legally Sound And Helps In Achieving Threefold Objectives FirstPassed By The High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh ) Anil Kumar vs Union Of India And Ors Date : 21-01-2019 This Was Called On For Hearing Today Coram : Hon'Ble Dr Justice D Y Chandrachud Hon'Ble Mr Justice Hemant Gupta
Judges: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta
21 January, 2019·Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.Leave granted.The appellant was aggrieved by the rejection of his claim for financial upgradation by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (“CSIR”) with effect from 10 May 2011. He was also aggrieved by not being promoted to the post of Senior Controller...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajasthan State Sports Council & Anr vs Smt Uma Dadhich & Anr Judgment Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Leave Granted NoThis Principle Has Been Reiterated In Several Decisions Of This Court [See H S Grewal 3 vs Union Of Indi A 1, Deepak Agarwal vs State Of Uttar Prades H2 And State Of Tripura vs Nikhil Ranjan Chakrabort Y 3 And Union Of India & Ors vs Krishna Kumar & Ors 4] The Judgment In Y vs Rangaiah vs Sreenivasa Ra O5 DealtOf Impugned Final Judgment And Order Dated 23-11-2015 In Dbcsa No 473/2015 Passed By The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jodhpur ) Rajasthan State Sports Council & Anr vs Smt Uma Dadhich & Anr Date : 21-01-2019 This Was Called On For Hearing Today Coram : Hon'Ble Dr Justice D Y Chandrachud Hon'Ble Mr Justice Hemant Gupta For Mr Sandeep Pathak, Adv Ms Archana Pathak Dave, Aor Mr Utsav, AdvHon'Ble Mr Justice Hemant Gupta For Mr Sandeep Pathak, Adv Ms Archana Pathak Dave, Aor Mr Utsav, Adv For Mr Rishabh Sancheti, Adv Mr Sanyat Lodha, Adv For Mr P vs Saravana Raja, Aor Upon Hearing The Counsel The Court Made The
Judges: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta
21 January, 2019·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 883 OF 2019 (@ SLP(C) No. 492 of 2017) RAJASTHAN STATE SPORTS COUNCIL & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS SMT. UMA DADHICH & ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.Leave granted.Responden...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.