Center Of Indian Trade Union, A ... vs The State Of Maharashtra
Judges:
11 April, 2019·Deepak Gupta, J.1. The petitioner had challenged the execution of the Power Project Agreement (PPA) and the modified power project agreements first of which was executed in the year 1993 by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (for short ‘the MSEB’) in favour of Dabhol Power Corporation Limited (...
Supreme Court Of India
Sevoke Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs West Bengal State Eletrictiy ...
Judges:
11 April, 2019·Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J 1 Leave granted.2 This appeal arises from a judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta dated 14 November 2018. Allowing the first appeal filed by the respondent against a decree for possession, the Division Bench directed, in consequence, that...
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman And Managing Director ... vs General Secretary Fact Employees ...
Judges:
11 April, 2019·Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.Signature Not Verified2. These appeals are directed against the final Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2019.04.11 17:17:57 IST Reason:judgment and order dated 25.01.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.A. 1 Nos.1820 and 1824 of 201...
Supreme Court Of India
Indibily Creative Pvt. Ltd. vs Govt. Of West Bengal
Judges:
11 April, 2019·Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J 1 Motivated by a mission to support meaningful Bengali cinema, the petitioners produced a film titled Bhobishyoter Bhoot. Their grievance, while invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution is that the State of West Bengal, its Departmen...
Supreme Court Of India
Atma Ram & Ors vs State Of RajasthanAtma Ram And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra
11 April, 2019·Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals challenge the decision dated 03.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in D.B. Criminal Death Reference No.2 of 2017 and D.B. Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2018.SIGN3. FIR No.493 was registered with Police Station Bhada...
Supreme Court Of India
Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd & Ors vs Govt Of West Bengal & Ors
Judges: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
11 April, 2019·Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1 Motivated by a mission to support meaningful Bengali cinema, the petitioners produced a film titled Bhobishyoter Bhoot. Their grievance, while invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution is that the State of West Bengal, its Department...
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman And Managing Director, The Fertilizers And Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd & Anr vs General Secretary Fact Employees Association & Ors
Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra
11 April, 2019·Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.SIGN1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 25.01.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.A.Nos.1820 and 1824 of 2012 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ appeals filed by the appell...
Supreme Court Of India
Yashwant Sinha & Ors vs Central Bureau Of Investigation Through Its Diector & AnrOur Notice In Fact, The Publication Of The Said Documents In ‘The Hindu’ Newspaper Reminds The Court Of The Consistent Views Of This Court Upholding The Freedom Of The Press In A Long Line Of Decisions Commencing From Romesh Thappar vs State Of Madras 1 And Brij Bhushan vs The State Of Delhi 2 Though Not In Issue, The Present Could Very Well Be An Appropriate Occasion To Recall The Views Expressed By This Court From Time To Time Illustratively And Only Because Of Its Comprehensiveness The Following Observations In Indian Express Newspapers ( Bombay ) Private Limited Vsunion Of IndiaThe Constituent Assembly And Its Various Committees And Sub Committees Considered Freedom Of Speech And Expression Which Included Freedom Of Press Also As A Precious Right The Preamble To The Constitution Says That It Is Intended To Secure To All Citizens Among Others Liberty Of Thought Expression, And 10 Belief In Romesh Thappar vs State Of Madras 4 And Brij Bhushan vs The State Of Delh I5, This Court Firmly Expressed ItsHas Been Described As The Fourth Estate The Democratic Credentials Of A State Is Judged Today By The Extent Of Freedom The Press Enjoys In That State According To Justice Douglas ( An Almanac Of Liberty ) “Acceptance By Government Of A Dissident Press Is A Measure Of The Maturity Of The Nation” The Learned Judge Observed In Terminiello vs ChicagoJonge vs State Of OregonThe Above Views Of The Supreme Court Of India On The Issue Of The Freedom Of The Press Has Been Echoed By The U S Supreme Court In New York Times Company vs United StatesTo Unpublished Public Records As Already Noticed, The Three Documents Have Been Published In Different Editions Of ‘The Hindu’ Newspaper That Apart, As Held In S P Gupta vs Union Of India 8 A Claim Of Immunity Against Disclosure Under Section 123 Of The Indian Evidence Act Has To Be Essentially Adjudged On The Touchstone Of Public Interest And To Satisfy Itself That Public Interest Is Not Put To Jeopardy By Requiring Disclosure The Court May Even Inspect The Document In Question Though The Said Power Has To Be Sparingly Exercised Such An Exercise, However ,Pooran Mal vs Director Of Inspection ( Investigation ) Of IncomeTax, New Delhi 9 This Court Has Taken The View That The “Test Of Admissibility Of Evidence Lies In Its Relevancy, Unless There Is An Express Or Necessarily Implied Prohibition In The Constitution Or Other Law Evidence Obtained As A Result Of Illegal Search Or Seizure Is Not Liable To Be Shut OutInsofar As The Right To Information Act Is Concerned In Chief Information Commissioner vs State Of Manipur 10Would Like To Observe In This Regard Is A Reiteration Of What Had Already Been Said By This Court In Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru vs State Of Kerala 11 “Judicial
Judges: K M Joseph
10 April, 2019·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 46 OF 2019INWRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 298 OF 2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. …PETITIONER(S) VERSUSCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGHITS DIECTOR & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S)WITHM.A.NO. 5...
Supreme Court Of India
Yashwant Sinha & Ors vs Central Bureau Of Investigation Through Its Diector & AnrOur Notice In Fact, The Publication Of The Said Documents In ‘The Hindu’ Newspaper Reminds The Court Of The Consistent Views Of This Court Upholding The Freedom Of The Press In A Long Line Of Decisions Commencing From Romesh Thappar vs State Of Madras 1 And Brij Bhushan vs The State Of Delhi 2 Though Not In Issue, The Present Could Very Well Be An Appropriate Occasion To Recall The Views Expressed By This Court From Time To Time Illustratively And Only Because Of Its Comprehensiveness The Following Observations In Indian Express Newspapers ( Bombay ) Private Limited Vsunion Of IndiaThe Constituent Assembly And Its Various Committees And Sub Committees Considered Freedom Of Speech And Expression Which Included Freedom Of Press Also As A Precious Right The Preamble To The Constitution Says That It Is Intended To Secure To All Citizens Among Others Liberty Of Thought Expression, And 10 Belief In Romesh Thappar vs State Of Madras 4 And Brij Bhushan vs The State Of Delh I5, This Court Firmly Expressed ItsHas Been Described As The Fourth Estate The Democratic Credentials Of A State Is Judged Today By The Extent Of Freedom The Press Enjoys In That State According To Justice Douglas ( An Almanac Of Liberty ) “Acceptance By Government Of A Dissident Press Is A Measure Of The Maturity Of The Nation” The Learned Judge Observed In Terminiello vs ChicagoJonge vs State Of OregonThe Above Views Of The Supreme Court Of India On The Issue Of The Freedom Of The Press Has Been Echoed By The U S Supreme Court In New York Times Company vs United StatesTo Unpublished Public Records As Already Noticed, The Three Documents Have Been Published In Different Editions Of ‘The Hindu’ Newspaper That Apart, As Held In S P Gupta vs Union Of India 8 A Claim Of Immunity Against Disclosure Under Section 123 Of The Indian Evidence Act Has To Be Essentially Adjudged On The Touchstone Of Public Interest And To Satisfy Itself That Public Interest Is Not Put To Jeopardy By Requiring Disclosure The Court May Even Inspect The Document In Question Though The Said Power Has To Be Sparingly Exercised Such An Exercise, However ,Pooran Mal vs Director Of Inspection ( Investigation ) Of IncomeTax, New Delhi 9 This Court Has Taken The View That The “Test Of Admissibility Of Evidence Lies In Its Relevancy, Unless There Is An Express Or Necessarily Implied Prohibition In The Constitution Or Other Law Evidence Obtained As A Result Of Illegal Search Or Seizure Is Not Liable To Be Shut OutInsofar As The Right To Information Act Is Concerned In Chief Information Commissioner vs State Of Manipur 10Would Like To Observe In This Regard Is A Reiteration Of What Had Already Been Said By This Court In Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru vs State Of Kerala 11 “Judicial
Judges: K M Joseph
10 April, 2019·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 46 OF 2019INWRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 298 OF 2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. …PETITIONER(S) VERSUSCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGHITS DIECTOR & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S)WITHM.A.NO. 5...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri N K Janu, Deputy Director Social Forestary Division, Agra And Others vs Lakshmi Chandra
Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hemant Gupta
10 April, 2019·Hemant Gupta, J.Leave granted.SIGN2. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 16.02.2018 whereby an application for recall of the order dated 06.12.2017 dismissing the Review Application in default was dismissed.3. The case has a chequered history. The respondent i...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.