Urmila Devi And Others vs The Deity, Mandir Shree Chamunda Devi, Through Temple Commissioner And Others
Judges: A K Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
10 January, 2018·ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed by the plaintiff through legal heirs questioning the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Regular Second Appeal No.117 of 2002 which appeal was filed by respondent SIGN No.1 (defendant No.6 in the suit). The High Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Upendra Sharma vs State Of Bihar & Anr
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Amitava Roy
10 January, 2018·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.57/2018 (ARISING FROM SLP (Crl) NO.277 OF 2016) UPENDRA SHARMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.Leave granted.2. The challe...
Supreme Court Of India
Shyam Narayan Chouksey vs Union Of India & Others
Judges: A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud
09 January, 2018·Dipak Misra, CJI.The petitioner, a public spirited person, has approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to take appropriate steps for inculcating in the publ...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Up & Ors vs Israr Ahmad & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Amitava Roy
08 January, 2018·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 230 OF 2009] THE STATE OF UP & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ISRAR AHMAD & ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.1. Application for setti...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh ... vs Pradeep Kumar
Judges: 3 T The, H 33 Concerned
08 January, 2018·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the candidature of the respondents who had disclosed their involvement in the criminal cases and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground Page No. 1 of 15 that they are not suita...
Supreme Court Of India
Nagaiah vs Chowdamma (Dead) By Lrs.
Judges:
08 January, 2018·J U D G M E N T MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.1. The judgment dated 08.01.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Regular Second Appeal No. 1102 of 2004 is called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. Signature Not Verified2. Digitally signed by SARITA PUROHIT Br...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration And Ors vs Pradeep Kumar And Another
Judges: R Banumathi, Uday Umesh Lalit
08 January, 2018·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the candidature of the respondents who had disclosed their involvement in the criminal cases and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground that they are not suitable f...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration And Ors vs Pradeep Kumar And Another
Judges: R Banumathi, Uday Umesh Lalit
08 January, 2018·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the candidature of the respondents who had disclosed their involvement in the criminal cases and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground that they are not suitable f...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration And Ors vs Pradeep Kumar And Another
Judges: R Banumathi, Uday Umesh Lalit
08 January, 2018·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the candidature of the respondents who had disclosed their involvement in the criminal cases and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground that they are not suitable f...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration And Ors vs Pradeep Kumar And Another
Judges: R Banumathi, Uday Umesh Lalit
08 January, 2018·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the candidature of the respondents who had disclosed their involvement in the criminal cases and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground that they are not suitable f...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.