Sagar Pandurang Dhundare vs Keshav Aaba Patil And Others
Judges: Kurian Joseph, R Banumathi
13 November, 2017·KURIAN, J.1. The crucial question to be decided is whether a family member of the original encroacher can be disqualified, under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (for short “the Act”). The enabling provision, as introduced by an amendment in 2006, reads as follows:“14.Disqualifications.-...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. ... vs State Of Maharashtra .
Judges:
13 November, 2017·Leave granted in both Special Leave Petitions.2. The present batch of appeals, between the same parties, arise from a controversy relating to auction settlement by the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (hereinafter referred to as “the MHADA”), of a plot of land measuring 10,000 sq. mtrs, loc...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaykrishna Industries Ltd Through Director vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersPopcorn Properties Private Ltd Through Director And Another vs State Of MaharashtraPopcorn Properties Private Ltd And Another vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersJaykrishna Industries Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersJaykrishna Industries Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra And Others
Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha
13 November, 2017·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.496 OF 2007 JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH DIRECTOR APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No. 498 of 2007 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD.THROUGH DIRE...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaykrishna Industries Ltd Through Director vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersPopcorn Properties Private Ltd Through Director And Another vs State Of MaharashtraPopcorn Properties Private Ltd And Another vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersJaykrishna Industries Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra And OthersJaykrishna Industries Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra And Others
Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha
13 November, 2017·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.496 OF 2007 JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH DIRECTOR APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No. 498 of 2007 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD.THROUGH DIRE...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Bhagta ( D ) Through Lrs & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, R Banumathi
13 November, 2017·KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The appellants are before this Court with certain grievances regarding the compensation awarded by the court in land acquisition proceedings. A batch of similar appeals came up before this Court, i.e. Civil Appeal Nos. 1949-1966 of 2016 & connected matt...
Supreme Court Of India
Prasadi Devi vs Nagar Palika Sawai Madhopur, ( Now Nagar Parishad )
Judges: R K Agrawal, Abhay Manohar Sapre
13 November, 2017·NON-REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.27333/2015) Prasadi Devi ...Appellant(s) VERSUS Nagar Palika Sawai Madhopur, (Now Nagar Parishad) …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rohit Tandon : vs : The Enforcement Directorate
Judges: Dipak Misra, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud
10 November, 2017·A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. By these appeals the order of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 5th May, 2017, rejecting the Bail Application No.119 of 2017 and Criminal M.B. No.121 of 2017 has been assailed. The appellant was arrested on 28th December, 2016 in SIGN connection with ECIR/18/DZII/2016...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Srd Nutrients Pvt.Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cent.Excise, ...
Judges: A Bhushan, A Sikri
10 November, 2017·A.K. SIKRI, J.Leave granted in the special leave petitions. Civil Appeal Nos. 2781-2790 of 2010 & Ors. Page 4 of 272) In order to encourage the business community to set up manufacturing units in industrially backward areas like the North-Eastern States, viz. Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Meghalaya, Tripu...
Supreme Court Of India
Uttarakhand Transport ... vs Sukhveer Singh
Judges: Mishra
10 November, 2017·L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.This Appeal is filed by the employer against the judgment of the High Court by which the order of dismissal of the Respondent- driver from service was set aside by the High Court.2. The Respondent was appointed as a driver with the Signature Not Verified Digitally s...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Srd Nutrients Private Limited vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Guwahati W
Judges: A K Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
10 November, 2017·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2781-2790 OF 2010 M/S. SRD NUTRIENTS PRIVATE LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO. 812 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 173...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.