Delhi Development Authority vs Vivek & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
30 September, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9898 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 29199 OF 2016 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) CC NO. 18417 OF 2016 ] DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS VIVEK & ORS. Responde...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of Patiala vs General Secretary, Staff Union & Ors
Judges: Anil R Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel, L Nageswara Rao
30 September, 2016·ANIL R. DAVE, J.11th October, 2012, delivered in LPA No.448/2010 (O&M) by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, this appeal has been filed by the employer-Bank.Page 1 24. The facts giving rise to the litigation, in a nutshell, are as under :The appellant had appointed Shri Bhagwant Singh...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P And Ors vs Z U Ansari
Judges: S Thakur, V Gopala Gowda
30 September, 2016·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9886 OF 2016 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.20985 of 2014] STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. …APPELLANTS VERSUS Z.U. ANSARI …RESPONDENTJ U D G M E N TT.S. THAKUR, CJI.1. Leave gra...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Up And Ors vs Z.U. Ansari
Judges: T S Thakur, V Gopala Gowda
30 September, 2016·T.S. THAKUR, CJI.Leave granted.This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 3rd February, 2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad whereby Writ Petition No.19485 of 2012 filed by the respondent has been allowed and disciplinary proceedings based on charge-sheet dated 26th Jun...
Supreme Court Of India
Vilas vs Sanghai vs Sumermal Mishrimal Bafna & AnrState Of Maharashtra vs Sumermal Mishrimal Bafna & Anr
Judges: Anil R Dave, L Nageswara Rao
30 September, 2016·ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22nd December, 1997 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Page 1 2 in Criminal Writ Petition No.22 of 1994, Criminal Appeal No.181 of 1998 has been filed by Vilas V. Sanghai against the order of punishment imposed upon him under ...
Supreme Court Of India
Govt Of Bihar And Ors Etc Etc vs Dayanand Singh Etc
Judges: Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre
29 September, 2016·ReportableIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9921-9923 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s).10163-10165 of 2015) GOVT. OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC. … Appellant(s) VERSUS DAYANAND SINGH ETC. ETC. … Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9924...
Supreme Court Of India
Shankar Hiranna Rajanna vs Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority And Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
29 September, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9877 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 11675 OF 2016] SHANKAR HIRANNA RAJANNA Appellant(s) VERSUS MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Customs And Central Excise, Mumbai vs M/S Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co Ltd
Judges: Anil R Dave, L Nageswara Rao
29 September, 2016·NON- REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1124/2003 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. DHARAMSI MORARJI CHEMICAL CO. LTD. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Hearing of t...
Supreme Court Of India
C.C.E., Mumbai vs M/S. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical ...
Judges: Anil R Dave, L Nageswara Rao
29 September, 2016·ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Hearing of this appeal was adjourned to await the decision of the Larger Bench in Commnr., Central Excise, Madras v. M/s. Adison & Co. Ltd. (C.A. No.7906 of 2002).2. Now, the judgment of the Larger Bench has been delivered on 29.08.2016.3. In view of the said judgment, the impugne...
Supreme Court Of India
Gujarat Maritime Board vs LandT; Infrastructure Development ...
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
28 September, 2016·J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.:Leave granted.Whether the High Court is justified in exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for restraining the appellant from invoking an unconditional bank guarantee executed by the first respondent, is the main issue ari...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.