Delhi Development Authority vs Harish Sawhney & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
29 November, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11855 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 8771 OF 2016 ] DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS HARISH SAWHNEY & ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted....
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others vs Subhash Chandra Jaiswal And Others
Judges: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy
29 November, 2016·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. Ordinarily we would have been loath to entertain an appeal by special leave challenging the interim order, but we are compelled to do so in the instant case. There is a singular reason for the same since the High Court has travelled much beyond the lis to issue direc...
Supreme Court Of India
Bismillah Be ( Dead ) By L Rs vs Majeed Shah
Judges: A K Sikri, Abhay Manohar Sapre
29 November, 2016·Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) Leave granted.2) These appeals are filed against the final judgments and orders dated 27.11.2009 in Second Appeal No. 1097 of 2007 and 15.01.2010 in Review Petition No. 656 of 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh whereby the Hig...
Supreme Court Of India
Dokiseela Ramulu vs Sri Sangameswara Swamy Varu And Others
Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Arun Mishra
29 November, 2016·2. The present controversy admittedly relates to 1 acre and 80-1/2 cents of agricultural land. Out of the above land, 33-1/2 cents is in Survey No.123/5, and the remaining 1 acre and 47 cents is in Survey No.129/2, of the revenue estate of Sangam Agraharam Village in Vangana Mandal, Srikakulam Dist...
Supreme Court Of India
Bindeshwari Chaudhary vs State Of Bihar & Ors
Judges: Chelameswar, Prafulla C Pant
29 November, 2016·Prafulla C. Pant, J.This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 20.05.2008, passed by High Court of Judicature at Patna, whereby Letters Patent Appeal No. 436 of 2000 was disposed of allowing respondent authorities to withhold 50% of gratuity and 50% of pension, of the appellant.Page 1 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Autar and Ors vs State Of Up
Judges: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy
28 November, 2016·AMITAVA ROY, J.(1) Leave granted.(2) The appellants hereby assail the affirmation of their conviction under Sections 147,148, 149 Indian Penal Code (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as “IPC”) as recorded by the Trial Court. By the decision impugned, the High Court, however has altered their ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ravindra And Anr vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Ukp, Bagalkot
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
28 November, 2016·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11359 OF 2016 [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.7971/2016] RAVINDRA AND ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BAGALKOT UKP, RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. NO.11361/2016 @...
Supreme Court Of India
Asutosh Mohanty vs Aparajita Mohanty
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
28 November, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11337 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 11858 OF 2016 ] ASUTOSH MOHANTY Appellant(s) VERSUS APARAJITA MOHANTY Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Autar & Ors vs State Of U P
Judges: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy
28 November, 2016·AMITAVA ROY, J.(1) Leave granted.(2) The appellants hereby assail the affirmation of their conviction under Sections 147,148, 149 Indian Penal Code (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as “IPC”) as recorded by the Trial Court. By the decision impugned, the High Court, however has altered their...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd Hashim vs State Of Up & Ors
Judges: Amitava Roy
28 November, 2016·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. Respondent Nos. 2 to 10 were prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short, 'the 1961 Act'). The respondent Nos.2 and 3 were convicted under Sectio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.