The Kelvin Jute Co Ltd Wors P F & Ors vs Krishna Kumar Agarwala & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2591 OF 2006 THE KELVIN JUTE CO.LTD.WORS.P.F.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS KRISHNA KUMAR AGARWALA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2593 OF 2006 J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.1. After having exten...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhukanta M Chinchani & Ors vs Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·KURIAN, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved since they are not granted just and fair land value in respect of the land acquired from them. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, we do not think it necessary to go in detail to the factual matrix, which to the extent relevant, is available at pa...
Supreme Court Of India
The Kelvin Jute Co Ltd Wors P F & Ors vs Krishna Kumar Agarwala & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2591 OF 2006 THE KELVIN JUTE CO.LTD.WORS.P.F.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS KRISHNA KUMAR AGARWALA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2593 OF 2006 J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.1. After having exten...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Karnataka Power Trans Corp Ltd vs M/S South Indian Sugar Mills Ass &Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 5429-5430 OF 2007 M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANS.CORP.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASS &ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.Civil Appeal No. 5430 of 20071. It has come ou...
Supreme Court Of India
Satish Kumar vs Karan Singh And Another
Judges: M Y Eqbal, Arun Mishra
21 January, 2016·M.Y. EQBAL, J.The question that needs consideration in the instant appeal is as to whether the so called agreement to sell dated 6.1.1995, which is extracted hereinbelow, is enforceable in law for passing a decree for specific performance of contract. The said agreement reads as under...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhiren Dave vs M/S Surat Dyes & Ors
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3765 OF 2006 DHIREN DAVE APPELLANT VERSUS M/S. SURAT DYES & ORS. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T KURIAN,J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed by the Company Judge directing p...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhukanta M Chinchani & Ors vs Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
21 January, 2016·KURIAN, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved since they are not granted just and fair land value in respect of the land acquired from them. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, we do not think it necessary to go in detail to the factual matrix, which to the extent relevant, is available at pa...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan And Ors vs Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog And ...
Judges: Anil R Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
20 January, 2016·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J1. Leave granted. The State of Rajasthan is aggrieved by the quashing of its order dated 16th December, 2014 whereby it declared its earlier order dated 25th April, 2012 as void and cancelled the mining lease No.45 of 1993. By the said earlier order the aforesaid lease was permit...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagatjit Industries Limited vs The Intelectual Prop Appellate ...
Judges: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
20 January, 2016·R.F. Nariman, J.Leave granted.The respondent No.4 is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the United States of America. It is an ultimate subsidiary of Pernord Ricard S.A., which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing a variety of alcoholic beverages worldwide. It claims t...
Supreme Court Of India
Venkatesh Constrn.Co vs Karnataka Vidyut Karkhane ...
Judges: T S Thakur, A K Sikri, R Banumathi
20 January, 2016·R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals assail the judgment dated 15.06.2010 in R.F.A. Nos.1051 of 2003 and 1076 of 2003, by which the High Court of Karnataka vide the common impugned judgment reversed the judgment of the trial court and allowed the appeal of respondent-defendant. While doing...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.