State Of Orissa vs M/S Samantary Constn Pvt Ltd & Anr
Judges: Anil R Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
11 September, 2015·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. The question raised in this appeal is whether any interference is called for with the award dated 29th June, 2003 on the basis of objections of the appellant-State of Orissa.2. The Respondent-Company (“the Contractor”) was awarded the work of “Construction of Mahanadi Barrage...
Supreme Court Of India
Ag vs Shiv Kumar Yadav & Anr
Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Adarsh Kumar Goel
10 September, 2015·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted. The issue raised for consideration in these appeals is whether recall of witnesses, at the stage when statement of accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.”) has been recorded, could be allowed on the plea that the defence counsel ...
Supreme Court Of India
Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty Ltd vs Shapoorji Pallonji & Co Ltd
Judges: Ranjan Gogoi
09 September, 2015·1. This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) has been lodged by one Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve certain disputes that have arisen out of three sub-contracts execut...
Supreme Court Of India
Taiyo Membrance Corp.P.Ltd vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Co.Ltd
Judges: Ranjan Gogoi
09 September, 2015·1. This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) has been lodged by one Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve certain disputes that have arisen out of three sub- contracts execu...
Supreme Court Of India
Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University Lucknow, U P vs Akhilesh Kumar Khare & Anr
Judges: Dipak Misra, R Banumathi
08 September, 2015·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5731 OF 2011 VICE-CHANCELLOR, LUCKNOW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW, U.P. ..Appellant Versus AKHILESH KUMAR KHARE & ANR. ..Respondents WITH C.A.NO.5732/2011, C.A.NO.5733/2011, C.A.NO.5736/201...
Supreme Court Of India
J Thansiama ( S ) vs State Of Mizoram & Ors
Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, N V Ramana
08 September, 2015·RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. The Gauhati High Court by the impugned judgment and order dated 01.08.2005 has held the Limitation Act, 1963 to be applicable to the State of Mizoram. Consequential to the said conclusion of the High Court, the suit filed by the appellant for declaration of title etc. was dismiss...
Supreme Court Of India
Vice Chancellor Luknow ... vs Akhilesh Kumar Khare andAmp;Anr
Judges: Dipak Misra, R Banumathi
08 September, 2015·R. BANUMATHI, J.This batch of appeals arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench dismissing the writ petitions [W.P.No.6690 of 1996 (S/S) and batch] dated 14.09.2009, whereby the High Court upheld the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal and direc...
Supreme Court Of India
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Company Ltd vs The Director ( Research ) For And On Behalf Of Deepak Khanna & Ors
Judges: Shiva Kirti Singh
07 September, 2015·SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The appellant is a company engaged in manufacture and sale of automobiles. It is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 28....
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Haryana & Anr vs Devander Sagar & OrsHaryana Urban Development Authoirty& Ors vs P K Dhawan & Ors
Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre
07 September, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.Page 1 2CIVIL APPEAL No. 318 OF 20111 This Appeal questions the correctness of the Judgment dated 12.3.2008 delivered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.W.P. No. 1123 of 2006, on the basis of which the High Court had also allowed C.W.P. No. 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Rail Travellers Service Agents ... vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: Anil R Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
07 September, 2015·ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the petitioners have made a representation on the subject-matter of the petitions and it has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the Union of India that the representation is under consideration.2. T...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.