Kamal Prashar vs National Airport Authority and Anr
Judges: Dipak Misra, Uday Umesh Lalit
28 October, 2015·Uday Umesh Lalit J.Civil Appeal No.1434 of 2008 seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 07.02.2006 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA Nos.21 of 1999 and 314 of 2000 as well as the order dated 02.06.2006 in Review Application No.209 of 2006 arising from said judgment and order dated 07....
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Rangnth Nagar vs Shrikant Govindrao Sangvikar
Judges: M Y Eqbal, C Nagappan
27 October, 2015·Leave granted.2. We have heard Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Chandrakant Giri, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondents and perused the common impugned judgment dated 13.02.2014 passed by the Bombay High Court.3. The short question that arises for considera...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Meridian Industries Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
27 October, 2015·A.K. SIKRI, J.The appellant-assessee is engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn which is 100% Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU) constituted as per Export and Import Policy 1997-2002. During the period August, 2000 to March, 2001, it had cleared the aforesaid cotton yarn made to Domestic Tariff Ar...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Gmr Energy Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, Bangalore
Judges: A K Sikri, R F Nariman
27 October, 2015·R.F. Nariman, J.1. Two appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 3.8.2007 passed by CESTAT. The appeal filed by the assessee M/s GMR Energy Ltd. concerns itself with the proper valuation of the import of parts of the Gas Turbine Hot Section of a naphtha based power plant which hav...
Supreme Court Of India
Mehboob Ali & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: H L Dattu, Arun Mishra
27 October, 2015·ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 28.5.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in Criminal Appeal Nos.39/2006 and 40/2006 and other connected matters, thereby upholding conviction and sentence of the a...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Rangnath Magar vs Shrikant Govindrao Sangvikar And
Judges: M Y Eqbal, C Nagappan
27 October, 2015·Leave granted.2. We have heard Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Chandrakant Giri, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondents and perused the common impugned judgment dated 13.02.2014 passed by the Bombay High Court.3. The short question that arises for considera...
Supreme Court Of India
Director General Of Foreign Trade And Another vs M/S Kanak Exports And Another WCase
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
27 October, 2015·A.K. SIKRI, J.Civil Appeal No. 554 of 2006 Civil Appeal No. 658 of 2006Civil Appeal No. 1587 of 2006 Civil Appeal No. 1589 of 2006 Transfer Case (Civil) No. 36 of 2007 Transfer Case (Civil) No. 1 of 2008 Transfer Case (Civil) No. 3 of 2008 Transfer Case (Civil) No. 49 of 2009 Writ Petition (Civil) N...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai vs M/S Nebulae Health Care Ltd
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
27 October, 2015·A.K. SIKRI, J.Delay condoned.2) These appeals raise an issue of eligibility of concession/exemption from excise duty that is provided under Notification nos. 8/1999, 8/2000, 8/2001, 8/2002 and 8/2003 to the Small Scale Industrial Units (for short, 'SSI Units'). It is not in dispute that the responde...
Supreme Court Of India
Managing Director, K S R T C vs New India Assurance Co Ltd & OrsMd Karnataka Road Transport Corpn & Anr vs Thippamma & Ors
Judges: H L Dattu, Arun Mishra
27 October, 2015·ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The questions involved in the appeals are whether in the wake of lease agreement entered into by registered owner with Karnataka State Road Page 1 2 Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘KSRTC’), the registered owner and insurer along with KSRTC can be fas...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr Sandeep S/O Sadashivrao Kansurkar And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Prafulla C Pant
27 October, 2015·Dipak Misra, J.The gravamen of grievance and the substratum of discontent of the petitioners in this writ petition, preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, is that though the primary eligibility criteria for appearing in the super- specialty entrance examination conducted in di...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.