Dhirendra Kumar @ Dhiroo vs State Of Uttarkhand
Judges: Dipak Misra, Adarsh Kumar Goel
26 February, 2015·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th November, 2007 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.158 of 2007 upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence to un...
Supreme Court Of India
K.P. Manu,Malabar Cements Ltd vs Chairman,Scrutiny Commt ...
Judges: Dipak Misra, V Gopala Gowda
26 February, 2015·Dipak Misra, J.In this appeal, by special leave, the assail is to the judgment and order dated 10th March, 2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala in M.F.A. No. 55 of 2006 wherein the High Court has accepted the report of the Scrutiny Committee constituted under the Kerala (Sch...
Supreme Court Of India
Ravindra vs State Of M.P
Judges: M Y Eqbal, Pinaki Chandra Ghose
26 February, 2015·Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated 12.3.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Criminal Appeal No.1275 of 1997 whereby the High Court has upheld the sentence awarded to the appellant by the Additional Session...
Supreme Court Of India
Gujarat Mineral Dev Corpn vs Ram Sang Bhailalbhai & AnrGujarat Mineral Dev Corpn vs Sarojben Gordhanbhai Patel & Ors
Judges: Vikramajit Sen, Pinaki Chandra Ghose
26 February, 2015·CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8161-8185 OF 2011Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'the Act') was published in respect of the land at Village Bhuri, taluka Jhagadia for the purpose of a Lignite Project as far back on 10th May, 1988. Declaration under Section 6 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Ors vs Dileep Kumar Singh
Judges: T S Thakur, R F Nariman
26 February, 2015·R.F.Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals raise an interesting question as to the interpretation of a proviso contained in Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (in short the “1995 Act”).3. The facts giving ris...
Supreme Court Of India
Amrutlal Liladharbhai Kotak & Ors : vs : State Of Gujarat
Judges: M Y Eqbal, Pinaki Chandra Ghose
26 February, 2015·Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. This criminal appeal, by special leave, is directed against the impugned common judgment dated June 17, 2009 of the High Court of Gujarat whereby the High Court dismissed Criminal Appeal No.1327 of 2004 filed by the appellants and confirmed the order passed by the Trial Co...
Supreme Court Of India
Tejram Patil vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel
26 February, 2015·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th November, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, in Criminal Appeal No.455 of 2003, upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentence of rigorous i...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajinder Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: T S Thakur, R F Nariman, Prafulla C Pant
26 February, 2015·R.F.Nariman, J.1. The facts of this case raises questions relating to one of the two great social evils practiced against the women of this country for centuries. In the facts presented before us, a young woman consumes pesticide having been driven to do so by repeated demands being made on her for ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajinder Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: T S Thakur, R F Nariman, Prafulla C Pant
26 February, 2015·R.F.Nariman, J.1. The facts of this case raises questions relating to one of the two great social evils practiced against the women of this country for centuries. In the facts presented before us, a young woman consumes pesticide having been driven to do so by repeated demands being made on her for ...
Supreme Court Of India
H L Gulati vs Union Of India And Others J U D G M E N T Jagdish Singh Khehar ,Office OfUnauthorised Release Of An Approximate Amount OfRegistrationEventuallyWherein The Was Arrayed As Accused No 1The Initiation Of Criminal ProceedingsInitiation Of Criminal ProceedingsThe, Wherein He Was Accused Of Four Articles Of Charge The Articles Of Charge Levelled Against The Are Being Extracted Hereunder : “Article I That The Said Shri H L Gulati, SaoThe Office Of Cda ( Hqrs ), New Delhi, Failed To Discharge His Duties Effectively As Provided For
Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar
26 February, 2015·1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8224-8225 OF 2011 H.L. Gulati ..Appellant versus Union of India and others ..Respondents J U D G M E N T JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.1. The appella...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.