Surya Vadanan vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors
Judges: Madan B Lokur, Uday Umesh Lalit
27 February, 2015·Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question before us relates to the refusal by the Madras High Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the children of Surya Vadanan and Mayura Vadanan. The appellant sought their production to enable him to take the children with him to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd Akbar vs Ashok Sahu & Ors
Judges: Chelameswar, Fali Nariman
27 February, 2015·Chelameswar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The General Election to Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly took place in 2013. The appellant herein is one of the contesting candidates for 72-Kawardha Legislative Assembly Constituency.3. Polling took place on 19.11.2013. The result was declared on 8.12.2013. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shyam Lal vs Deepa Dass Chela Ram Chela Garib Dass
Judges: M Y Eqbal, Shiva Kirti Singh
27 February, 2015·M. Y. EQBAL, J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 28.6.2010 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the second appeal filed by the appellant- plaintiff was dismissed with costs throughout.2. The litigation between the parties commenced on the filing of the su...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramakant Mishra @ Lalu Etc vs State Of U P
Judges: Vikramajit Sen, R K Agrawal
27 February, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 These Appeals assail the Judgment dated 13.07.2010 of the learned Single Judge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow, who had affirmed the conviction of the Appellants and the sentencing under Sections 498A and 304B of the IPC pronounced by the VIIIth Additional Distric...
Supreme Court Of India
Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And OrsGovt Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors vs Sudhar Samiti Rajiv Nagar Ext ( Regd ) And Ors
Judges: Shiva Kirti Singh
27 February, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 Any determination under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, must proceed sequentially. First, the factum of an Award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, must...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Ram Pal
Judges: T S Thakur, Adarsh Kumar Goel
27 February, 2015·ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 27th February, 2013 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Criminal Appeal No.406 of 2011.3. Only question raised for consideration is whether the sentence imposed in the facts...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Sherali Khan Mohamed Manekia vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Judges: M Y Eqbal, Kurian Joseph
27 February, 2015·M.Y. Eqbal, J.:Leave granted.2. In the instant appeals by special leave the appellant assailed the order dated 14th January, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Court Receiver’s Report No.25 of 2007 and Additional Report No. 383 of 2012, whereby the High Court while d...
Supreme Court Of India
Surya Vadanan vs State Of Tamilnadu and Ors
Judges: Madan B Lokur, Uday Umesh Lalit
27 February, 2015·Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question before us relates to the refusal by the Madras High Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the children of Surya Vadanan and Mayura Vadanan. The appellant sought their production to enable him to take the children with him to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Bathinda Dev Auth Formerly Known As ( Puda ) vs Iqbal Singh & Others
Judges: Prafulla C Pant
26 February, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 Delay condoned. Leave granted.2 This Appeal assails the Order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, which had allowed the Writ Petitions before it, and declared that the acquisition had lapsed for the reason that the possession had not been taken and compen...
Supreme Court Of India
Bathida Dev. Auth. Formerly Known ... vs Iqbal Singh And Ors
Judges: Vikramajit Sen, Prafulla C Pant
26 February, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2 This Appeal assails the Order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, which had allowed the Writ Petitions before it, and declared that the acquisition had lapsed for the reason that the possession had not been taken and compe...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.