L.C. Hanumanthappa (Since ... vs H.B.Shivakumar
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
26 August, 2015·R.F. Nariman, J.Leave granted.2. The present case arises out of cross suits filed by the parties. On 9th March, 1990, one L.C. Hanumanthappa filed a suit against one H.B. Shivakumar for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, his servants and agents from disturbing the peaceful possession a...
Supreme Court Of India
L C Hanumanthappa ( Since Dead ) Represented By His Lrs vs H B Shivakumar
Judges: A K Sikri, R F Nariman
26 August, 2015·R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present case arises out of cross suits filed by the parties. On 9th March, 1990, one L.C. Hanumanthappa filed a suit against one H.B. Shivakumar for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, his servants and agents from disturbing the peaceful p...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Ors vs 3989606 P, Ex-Naik Vijay Kumar
Judges: T S Thakur, R Banumathi
26 August, 2015·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6583 OF 2015 (Arising out of CAD No.13923 of 2014) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Appellants Versus 3989606 P, EX-NAIK VIJAY KUMAR ..Respondent J U D G M E N T R. BANUMATHI, J.Delay condoned.2. Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Uoi and Others vs No. 3989606 P, Ex-Nk Vijay Kumar
Judges: T S Thakur, R Banumathi
26 August, 2015·R. BANUMATHI, J.Delay condoned.2. This appeal is filed against the order dated 13.07.2011 in Original Application No.248 of 2011 and order dated 31.10.2012 in M.A.Nos.795 and 796 of 2012 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chandigarh (for short ‘the tribunal’) whereby the tribunal a...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab vs M/S Bandeep Singh & OrsPunjab State Leather Development Corporation & Ors Apellants vs Bandeep Singh & Ors
Judges: Shiva Kirti Singh
25 August, 2015·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 These Appeals assail the Judgment dated 20.9.2005 of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No. 9621 of 2004. The factual matrix is that pursuant to an Auction Notice dated 1.5.2004 issued by the Managing Director, Punjab State Leather Development Corporat...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Purolator India Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi
Judges: A K Sikri, R F Nariman
25 August, 2015·R.F. Nariman, J.1. M/s Purolator India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods, namely Filter Elements, Inserts, and Cartridges and Components. These goods are either cleared by the appellant to various vehicle manufacturers o...
Supreme Court Of India
C.C.E., Chennai vs Hindustan Lever Ltd
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
25 August, 2015·A.K. SIKRI, J.The issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether Vaseline Intensive Care Heel Guard (for short, 'VHG') is to be treated as merely a skin care preparation or it is a medicament having curing properties. Based on the answer to the aforesaid question, classification of this produ...
Supreme Court Of India
Central Warehousing ... vs Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat And Ors
Judges: Anil R Dave, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph
25 August, 2015·ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted in SLP(C)No.19057/2009.2. The dispute raised in these appeals pertains to the dispute on liability to pay tax. The appellant claims that since they have been included in the area carved out of the Gram Panchayat, under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Purolator India Ltd vs Commnr. Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: A K Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman
25 August, 2015·R.F. Nariman, J.1. M/s Purolator India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods, namely Filter Elements, Inserts, and Cartridges and Components. These goods are either cleared by the appellant to various vehicle manufacturers or stock transf...
Supreme Court Of India
Fireman Ghulam Mustafa vs State Of Uttaranchal ( Now Uttarakhand )
Judges: M Y Eqbal, C Nagappan
25 August, 2015·1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals are preferred against the common judgment dated 2.4.2014 of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, in Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 96 of 2003.Page 1 23. Both the appellants were accused nos. 1 and 2 in S. T. No. 80 of 1998 on the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.