Brijesh Kumar & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors
Judges: B S Chauhan, Chelameswar
24 March, 2014·1. These petitions have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2013, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing the Civil Misc. Applications in RFA No.5793 of 2012 for condonation of delay of more than10 years in filing the appeal under Section 54 of the...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajasthan State Tpt Corpn & Anr vs Bajrang Lal
Judges: B S Chauhan, Chelameswar
14 March, 2014·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as `Corporation’) against the judgment and order dated 8.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench) in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Biswanath Ghosh ( Dead ) By Lrs And Others vs Gobinda Ghosh Alias Gobindha Chandra Ghosh And Others Judgment M Y EqbalOf Money1964 On The Same Day, A Registered Ekrarnama Was Also Executed Between The Parties Stipulating The Terms Of Re-Conveyance On PaymentThe YearThe Defendants Before The Sub - Divisional Munsif, Bangaon Under Section 36The Said Suit Was Resisted By The Defendants -, Stating Therein That The Aforesaid Sale Deed Executed By The Plaintiffs Was Out An Out-Sale Of The Suit Property And Possession Was Also Delivered ToMunsifPageAllow The Plaintiffs - An Opportunity For Amending The Plaint And To Add Prayer For Specific Performance Of The Contract And To Pass Fresh Judgment In AccordanceAdding Prayer For Specific Performance Of Contract To Transfer The Suit Property In Terms Of The Agreement For Re-Conveyance The Said Application For Amendment Was Allowed And The Learned Munsif Framed Additional Issues, And After Considering The Evidence On Record Finally Decreed The Suit Holding That The Suit Was Not Barred By Limitation The Court
Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, M Y Eqbal
14 March, 2014·M.Y. EQBAL, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.3.2005 passed by Calcutta High Court in S.A. No.244 of 1987 whereby the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court as also the Appellate Court has been reversed and the suit was dismissed holding that the su...
Supreme Court Of India
J Rajiv Subramaniyan & Anr vs M/S Pandiyas & Ors
Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, A K Sikri
14 March, 2014·SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J.1. Leave granted.2. These special leave petitions are directed against the final judgment and order dated 14th June, 2011 passed by the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) in W.A.No.417 of 2011 dismissing the aforesaid Writ Page 1 2 Appeal filed by the appellants.3...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab And Others vs Dhanjit Singh Sandhu
Judges: B S Chauhan, M Y Eqbal
14 March, 2014·M.Y. EQBAL, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 8.1.2009 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No.8864 of 2007 and also order dated 27.3.2009 passed in Review Petition No. 112 of 2009, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent was allowed and ...
Supreme Court Of India
Kesharbai @ Pushpabai Eknathrao Nalawade ( D ) By Lrs & Anr vs Tarabai Prabhakarrao Nalawade & Ors
Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, A K Sikri
14 March, 2014·SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd March, 2009 of the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rendered in First Appeal No.468 of 2004 whereby the High Court has partly allowed the First Appeal of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Phanidhar Kalita vs Saraswati Devi and Anr
Judges: T S Thakur, C Nagappan
14 March, 2014·C. NAGAPPAN, J.1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23.3.2007 in R.S.A. No.116 of 2000 and the order dated 1.4.2008 in Review Petition no.1 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge of the Guwahati High Court, whereby the High Court has partly allowed the Regular Sec...
Supreme Court Of India
Saroj @ Suraj Panchal & Anr vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: T S Thakur, C Nagappan
13 March, 2014·C. NAGAPPAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.A. no.207 of 2002.3. The appellants herein are accused nos.1 and 3 respectively in Sessions Trial Case no.XXX(April) of 2000 on the file of Fourth Additional Sessions Judge at How...
Supreme Court Of India
Kanhaiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: T S Thakur, C Nagappan
13 March, 2014·C. NAGAPPAN, J.Leave granted.1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, in D.B. Crl. Appeal No.515 of 2004.2. The appellant herein Kanhaiya Lal, is accused No.2 in Sessions Trial No.01 of 2004 on the file Page 1 2 of Additional Distri...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhagwan Tukaram Dange vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Vikramajit Sen
13 March, 2014·K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Appellant herein, accused No.1 (A-1) along with his father, accused No.2 (A-2) was charge-sheeted for the offences of murder of his wife under Sections 302, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. A-1 and A- 2 were found guilty and sentenced to suffer imprisonme...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.