Pundappa Yankappa Pujari vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2014·Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16th June, 2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No.9/2000. By the impugned judgment the High Court partly allowed the appeal preferred by the State of Karnataka, set aside the judgment of acqui...
Supreme Court Of India
Rishipal Singh vs State Of U P & Anr
Judges: Ranjana Prakash Desai, N V Ramana
02 July, 2014·N.V. RAMANA. J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of order dated 6th November, 2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad refusing the prayer of the appellant for quashing the proceedings in Complaint Case No. 2397 of 2012 under Sections 34, 379, 411, 417, 418, 420, 457, 458 and 477 IPC ...
Supreme Court Of India
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, Pinaki Chandra Ghose
02 July, 2014·Chandramauli Kr. PrasadThe petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called as IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The maximum sentence provided under Section 498-A IPC is imprisonment for a term which may extend to...
Supreme Court Of India
Pradeep Kumar vs State Of Haryana
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, S A Bobde
02 July, 2014·Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 3rd February, 2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRA No.909-SB of 1997. By the impugned common judgment the High Court dismissed the revision application preferred by ...
Supreme Court Of India
Davinder Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: S A Bobde
02 July, 2014·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,JThis appeal is directed against judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 471-SB of 1999 whereby the High Court confirmed the judgment and order dated 23rd April, 1999 rendered by Additional Sess...
Supreme Court Of India
Seena @ Srinivasa vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2014·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2004 SEENA @ SRINIVASA … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA … RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 166-167 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J.These app...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohammad Hafizullah & Ors vs Javed Akhtar & Ors
Judges: Anil R Dave, R K Agrawal
02 July, 2014·1REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4712 OF 2007 Mohammad Hafizullah & Ors. ... Appellants Versus Javed Akhtar & Ors. ... Respondents J U D G M E N T ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26th June, 2007...
Supreme Court Of India
Arjun Jadav vs State Of West Bengal and Ors
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2014·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J The petitioner, who was convicted for the offence u/s 302/34 IPC, has preferred this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in the nature of habeas corpus for setting the petitioner at liberty from the illegal custody in the prison/correctional Hom...
Supreme Court Of India
Amar Singh Yadav vs State Of U P
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Dipak Misra
01 July, 2014·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,JThese appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 16th February, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1942 of 2009 and Reference No.5 of 2009. By the impugned common judgment, the High Court dismissed the appeal and c...
Supreme Court Of India
Umakant & Anr vs State Of Chhatisgarh
Judges: Dipak Misra, N V Ramana
01 July, 2014·N.V. RAMANA, J.Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24th September, 2010 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 495 of 2005 maintaining their conviction and sentence under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC, the appellants have filed this app...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.