Jharkhand State Elect Board & Ors vs M/S Laxmi Business & Cement Co P Ltd & Anr
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
28 February, 2014·A.K.SIKRI,J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant in both the cases is Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB), which is aggrieved by the common judgment dated 5th July 2011 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand in two appeals. These appeals were preferred by the appella...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Ram B Dhus Vsshri Anil Shantaram Khoje & Ors
Judges: T S Thakur, Vikramajit Sen
28 February, 2014·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1. Leave granted in both these petitions.2. Although interim orders have not been granted in the appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.15868 of 2010, in the accompanying matter it had been Page 1 2 ordered on 01.07.2011 that any promotion that may be made would be subject to the result o...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur-Ii vs M/S Super Synotex ( India ) Ltd And Others
Judges: Anil R Dave, Dipak Misra
28 February, 2014·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 16248 of 2009.2. This batch of appeals preferred under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for brevity, the Act) being inter- connected and inter-linked was heard together and is disposed of by a common judgment. It is n...
Supreme Court Of India
Nisha Devi vs State Of H P & Ors
Judges: T S Thakur, Vikramajit Sen
28 February, 2014·VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J.1. Leave granted.2. Delay condoned.1 Page 13. By means of these Appeals the Appellant/ Petitioner assails the decision of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in C.W.P.No.4169 of 2009, whereby her appointment as an Anganwadi Worker, on 11.04.2007, was set aside. The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Cbi, Acb, Mumbai ( S ) vs Narendra Lal Jain & Ors ( S )
Judges: Sathasivam, N V Ramana
28 February, 2014·RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) ACB, Mumbai seeks to challenge an order dated 28.10.2005 passed by the High Court of Bombay quashing the criminal proceedings against the respondents Narendra Lal Jain, Jayantilal L. Shah and Ramanla...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar Aggarwal vs Sumit Bose & Another
Judges: B S Chauhan, J Chelameswar
28 February, 2014·NON-REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 116 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9454/2013 Ashok Kumar Aggarwal …..Petitioner Versus Sumit Bose & Another ….Respondents J U D G M E N T Chelameswar, J.1. This contempt pet...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan vs Parmanand & Anr
Judges: Ranjana Prakash Desai, Madan B Lokur
28 February, 2014·(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. The respondents were tried by the Special Judge (NDPS Cases), Chhabra, District Baran for offences under Section 8 read with Section 18 and under Section 8 read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act).2. The case o...
Supreme Court Of India
Commr.Mun.Corp.Of Gr.Mumbai vs Anil Shantaram Khoje and Ors
Judges: T S Thakur, Vikramajit Sen
28 February, 2014·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1. Leave granted in both these petitions.2. Although interim orders have not been granted in the appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.15868 of 2010, in the accompanying matter it had been ordered on 01.07.2011 that any promotion that may be made would be subject to the result of the pet...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahesh Dhanaji Shinde ( S ) vs State Of Maharashtra ( S )
Judges: Sathasivam, Shiva Kirti Singh
27 February, 2014·RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. The appellants, Santosh Manohar Chavan, Amit Ashok Shinde, Yogesh Madhukar Chavan and Mahesh Dhanaji Shinde who were tried as accused Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 (hereinafter referred to as A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-6) in Sessions Case Nos. 3/2005, 4/2005 and 5/2005 have assaile...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharti vs State Of Haryana & Anr
Judges: Madan B Lokur
27 February, 2014·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Faridabad in Sessions Case No. 12 of 2001 for an offence punishable under Section 451 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, to suffer fu...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.