Ajoy Acharya vs State Bureau Of Inv.Against ...
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
17 September, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Investigation into the affairs of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation (renamed as Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the ‘MPSIDC’) was ordered with effect from 3.1.1996, by the State Government. Thereupon, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ajoy Acharya vs State Bureau Of Inv Against Eco Offence
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
17 September, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Investigation into the affairs of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation (renamed as Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the ‘MPSIDC’) was ordered with effect from 3.1.1996, by the State Governme...
Supreme Court Of India
L R Venkata Ramana & Anr vs The United India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Judges: Anil R Dave, Dipak Misra
17 September, 2013·lANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Civil Misc. Appeal No.1016 of 2007 on 27th December, 2010, this appeal has been preferred on behalf of the claimants in a Motor Accident Claim Petition.3. The facts giving rise to the p...
Supreme Court Of India
Gail ( India ) Limited vs Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited
Judges: G S Singhvi, V Gopala Gowda
17 September, 2013·G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court was justified in entertaining the writ petition filed by the respondent under Article 226 of the Constitution in the matter of fixation of price of the gas supplied by the appellant and whether a mandamus could ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Escorts Limited vs Rama Mukherjee
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
17 September, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. This Court on 21.2.2013 directed that the instant SLP (Crl.) No.7325 of 2012 be listed after the pronouncement of judgment in Criminal Appeal no. 808 of 2013 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9434 of 2011), titled Nishant Aggarwal vs. Kailash Kumar Sharma. Nishant Aggarwal’s...
Supreme Court Of India
Kollam Chandra Sekhar vs Kollam Padma Latha
Judges: G S Singhvi, V Gopala Gowda
17 September, 2013·V. Gopala Gowda, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the common judgment and order dated 28.09.2006 passed in CMA No.Page 1 2 2858 of 2002 and CMA No. 2859 of 2002 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh as it has set aside the judgment and decree of divorce granted in favour of the appel...
Supreme Court Of India
Channabasappa(Dead ) By Lr & Anr vs State Of Karnataka & Ors
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Ranjan Gogoi
17 September, 2013·1REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO. 8289 OF 2013(arising out of SLP(C)No.14496 of 2006) CHANNABASAPPA(DEAD) BY LR & ANR. … APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. … RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave gran...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd Patiala & Ors vs Atma Singh Grewal
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
17 September, 2013·1.Petitioner No. 1 is the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB); Petitioner No. 2 is the Chief Engineer, HRD-cum-Inquiry Officer and Petitioner No. 3 is the Senior Executive Engineer working in PSEB. Respondent was the employee of PSEB who retired from service, with effect from 30.4.2004. He had gi...
Supreme Court Of India
Dredging Corporation Of India Ltd vs P K Bhattacherjee W I
Judges:
17 September, 2013·VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8278 OF 2013[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.26414 of 2011]1. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in detail.The Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation (1st Court), West Bengal held on 24.6.2010 that the Applicant/Respondent had met with an accid...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
16 September, 2013·A.K. SIKRI, J.1. Leave granted.2. We heard the Counsel for the parties at length. Having regard to the nature of issue involved that needs to be answered by us, it would be enough to to take note of some admitted facts, eschewing detailed factual discussion which may unnecessarily burden this judgme...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.