Gothamchand Jain vs Arumugam @ Tamilarasan
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
18 September, 2013·K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. We are, in this appeal, concerned with the applicability of the provisions of the Indian Limitation Page 1 2 Act, 1956, vis-à-vis, Article 2262 of the French Code Civil, said to be the governing law of limitation in the Union Territory of Pondiche...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr B R Ambedkar Medical College & Ors vs Union Of India & Another
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
18 September, 2013·K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. Petitioners have approached this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Page 1 2 Corrigendum Notification No. 37(1)2013/One Time Permission/Med./19355,...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Gujarat Flluro Chemicals
Judges: H L Dattu, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, M Y Eqbal
18 September, 2013·1. Doubting the correctness or otherwise of the decision of this Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors., (2006) 2 SCC 508, a bench of two learned Judges has referred the following question of law for our consideration and authoritative pronouncement by order ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat vs Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals
Judges: H L Dattu, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
18 September, 2013·1. Doubting the correctness or otherwise of the decision of this Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors., (2006) 2 SCC 508, a bench of two learned Judges has referred the following question of law for our consideration and authoritative pronouncement by order ...
Supreme Court Of India
U P Power Corporation Ltd vs N T P C Ltd & Ors
Judges: T S Thakur, Vikramajit Sen
18 September, 2013·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4117 OF 2006 U.P. Power Corporation Ltd.Appellant Versus N.T.P.C. Ltd. & Ors.… …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5361-5362 OF 2007 J U D G M E N T T.S. THAKUR, J.1. This appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity...
Supreme Court Of India
Ranjeet Goswami vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
18 September, 2013·K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. We notice with concern the commission of large number of crimes by the juveniles at a time when there is a hue and cry to lower the age limit of juvenile in conflict with law within the meaning of clause (l) of Section 2 of the Juvenile Justice (Care ...
Supreme Court Of India
Educare Charitable Trust vs Union Of India & Anr
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
17 September, 2013·[REPORTABLE] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No. 22910 OF 2013 Educare Charitable Trust ……Petitioner Vs.Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents J U D G M E N T A.K.SIKRI,J.1. In this pe...
Supreme Court Of India
Nidhan Singh ( D ) Th Lrs : vs : Santa Singh ( D ) Th Lrs
Judges: H L Gokhale, J Chelameswar
17 September, 2013·1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8575 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.19735/2006) NIDHAN SINGH (D) TH LRS. Appellant(s) :VERSUS:SANTA SINGH (D) TH LRS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, learned senio...
Supreme Court Of India
Gail (India) Ltd vs Gujarat State Petroleum Corpn. ...
Judges: G S Singhvi, V Gopala Gowda
17 September, 2013·G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court was justified in entertaining the writ petition filed by the respondent under Article 226 of the Constitution in the matter of fixation of price of the gas supplied by the appellant and whether a mandamus could ...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab State Power ... vs Atma Singh Grewal
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, A K Sikri
17 September, 2013·1. Petitioner No. 1 is the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB); Petitioner No. 2 is the Chief Engineer, HRD-cum-Inquiry Officer and Petitioner No. 3 is the Senior Executive Engineer working in PSEB. Respondent was the employee of PSEB who retired from service, with effect from 30.4.2004. He had gi...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.