Secretary To Government Of India vs Sawinder Kaur And Another
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra
21 March, 2013·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. The husband of the respondent No. 1, late Gurnam Singh Dhillon, had applied for grant of freedom fighter pension on the basis that he had participated in the freedom struggle and had joined the Indian National Army or Azad Hind Fauj (for short “the INA”) during...
Supreme Court Of India
Sec.To Govt.Of India vs Sawinder Kaur and Anr
Judges: K S Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra
21 March, 2013·Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. The husband of the respondent No. 1, late Gurnam Singh Dhillon, had applied for grant of freedom fighter pension on the basis that he had participated in the freedom struggle and had joined the Indian National Army or Azad Hind Fauj (for short “the INA”) during 1941-4...
Supreme Court Of India
Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) vs The State Of Maharashtra,Through Stf, Cbi MumbaiRubina Suleman Memon (A-8) vs The State Of Maharashtra,Through Stf, Cbi MumbaiThe State Of Maharashtra vs Suleman Abdul Razak & Ors Yusuf Abdul Razak Memon (A-4) vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Stf, Cbi Mumbai
Judges: B S Chauhan, P Sathasivam
21 March, 2013·APPEALS RELATING TO LIFE SENTENCEPART-2REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1178 of 2007Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) Appellant(s) vs.The State of Maharashtra, through STF, CBI Mumbai ...Respondent(s) WITHCriminal Appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Acquittal ( PartState Of Maharashtra vs Fazal Rehman AbdulState Of Maharashtra vs Fazal Rehman AbdulState Of Maharashtra vs Fazal Rehman Abdul
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
21 March, 2013·APPEALS FILED BY THE STATE AGAINST ACQUITTAL (PART- 5)REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2011State of Maharashtra …Appellant Versus Fazal Rehman Abdul … RespondentWITHCriminal Appeal...
Supreme Court Of India
Ahmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A S Mubarak S vs State Of MaharashtraAhmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A S Mubarak S vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
21 March, 2013·APPEALS FILED BY ACCUSED WITH STATE APPEAL (PART – 4)REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1438 OF 2007 Ahmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A.S. Mubarak S …Appellant State of Maharash … RespondentCCCriminal Appeal No. 1311 of 2007 AND...
Supreme Court Of India
Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan vs State Of MaharashtraIbrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
21 March, 2013·Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J:1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgments and orders dated 29.11.2006 and 6.6.2007 passed by a Special Judge of the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the `TADA’) in the Bombay Blast Case...
Supreme Court Of India
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, BombayYakub Abdul Razak Memon ( S ) vs State Of Maharashtra Thr, Cbi, Bombay
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
21 March, 2013·P. Sathasivam, J.1) This appeal and the connected matters have been directed against the final orders and judgments of conviction and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 19...
Supreme Court Of India
Tej Prakash Pathak & Others vs Rajasthan High Court & Others
Judges: R M Lodha, Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur
20 March, 2013·Chelameswar, J.1. Leave granted “….the rules of the game …. the criteria for selection cannot be altered by the authorities concerned in the middle or after the process of selection has commenced”1 “… changing the rules of the game after the game was played …is clearly impermissible”2 1 Maharashtra ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shivdev Kaur ( D ) By Lrs & Ors vs R S Grewal
Judges: B S Chauhan, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
20 March, 2013·Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J:1. These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 2.7.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No. 257 of 1982 and Regular Second Appeal No. 608 of 1982 and Cross Objection No. 14-C of 1982 by w...
Supreme Court Of India
Sushil K Chakravarty ( D ) Thr Lrs vs M/S Tej Properties Pvt Ltd
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
19 March, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The impugned order herein dated 17.10.2011 was passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (hereinafter referred to as, the High Court), whereby, it dismissed, by a common order, FAO (OS) no. 516 of 2009 and FAO (OS) no. 517 of 2009. Both the afores...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.