Makarand Dattatreya Sugavkar vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And Others
Judges: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
01 July, 2013·G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against order dated 22.3.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.187/2011 whereby the appellant’s prayer for issue of a mandamus to the Commissioner, Mumbai Municipal Corporation (respondent No.2) to g...
Supreme Court Of India
Vanchalabai Raghunath Ithape ( D ) By Lr vs Shankarrao Baburao Bhilare ( D ) By Lrs And Others
Judges: P Sathasivam, M Y Eqbal
01 July, 2013·M.Y. EQBAL, J.Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.7.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No.295 of 1988, whereby the second appeal filed by the plaintiff- appellant was dismissed a...
Supreme Court Of India
S Iyyapan ( S ) vs M/S United India Insurance Company Ltd And Another
Judges: M Y Eqbal
01 July, 2013·M.Y. Eqbal, J.:Leave granted.2. The right of the victim of a road accident to claim compensation is a statutory one. The Parliament in its wisdom inserted the relevant provisions in the Motor Vehicles Act in order to protect the victims of road accident travelling in the vehicle or using the...
Supreme Court Of India
Ahsanul Hoda vs State Of Bihar
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
01 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.This appeal appellant against has been filed the judgment and by the claimant order of the Patna High Court dated 10.2.2011 by which the High Court reduced the compensation awarded to the claimant, by fixing the lower market rate of the land in question and set aside ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sarabjit Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
01 July, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Leave granted.2. Sarabjit Singh, the appellant herein, purchased 30 kanals 11 marlas of land from Salamat Masih through two deeds dated 11.2.1992 and 13.3.1992. The pleadings in the instant appeal reveal, that the aforesaid purchase made by the appellant was out of a tota...
Supreme Court Of India
Nishant Aggarwal vs Kailash Kumar Sharma
Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar
01 July, 2013·P.Sathasivam,J.1) Leave granted.2) The question which has to be decided in this appeal is whether the Court, where a cheque is deposited for collection, would have territorial jurisdiction to try the accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act...
Supreme Court Of India
K Guruprasad Rao vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi, Ranjana Prakash
01 July, 2013·G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Leave granted.2. With the hope of their immortalization, several Emperors, Kings and other rich people got built temples, churches, mosques and other buildings in different parts of the world including India. Many of these structures are not only marvels of architecture, but also ...
Supreme Court Of India
U P Power Corporation Ltd & Ors vs Anis Ahmad
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
01 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.The questions involved in these appeals are; a) whether complaints filed by the respondents before the Consumer Forum constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 were maintainable and; b) whether the Consumer Forum has Page 1 2 jurisdiction to entertain a compl...
Supreme Court Of India
P Dharni & Ors vs Govt Of Tamil Nadu & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, Jagdish Singh Khehar
01 July, 2013·Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The controversy raised in the instant appeal revolves around the genuineness of the claim of respondent no. 5, K.V. Karthalingan, for promotion from the post of Motor Vehicles Inspector (Grade II) to the post of Regional Transport Officer. In order to und...
Supreme Court Of India
Neerupam Mohan Mathur vs New India Assurance Co
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
01 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave granted.2. The present appeal is filed by the claimantappellant against the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in FAO No.693 of 1989, whereby the High Court granted a meager enhancement in the amount of compensation awarded to him by the Mot...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.