Majjal vs State Of Haryana
Judges: G S Singhvi, Ranjana Prakash Desai, Sharad Arvind Bobde
02 July, 2013·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, by grant of special leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 14/2/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing Criminal Appeal No.920-DB of 2009 filed by the appellant.Page 1 23. Briefly stated the prosecution...
Supreme Court Of India
Dharamvir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: A K Patnaik, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
02 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 31st July, 2009 in LPA No.26 of 2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachanl Pradesh, Shimla whereby the Division Bench allowed the appeal preferred by the U...
Supreme Court Of India
Rafique @ Rauf & Others vs State Of U P
Judges: B S Chauhan, Ibrahim Kalifulla
02 July, 2013·Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. This appeal by the eight accused who were proceeded against in Crime No.397/97 in Sessions Case No.35/1998 in the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge, District Kannauj, were charged and convicted for offences falling under Section 302 read with 149, 307 r...
Supreme Court Of India
And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
02 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated 20th April, 2010 in W.P.(C)No.2622 of 2010. The relevant portion of the said judgment reads as follows:“O R D E R 20.04.2010 Aft...
Supreme Court Of India
Babu @ Balasubramaniam And Anr vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: A K Patnaik, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2013·(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. The appellants (A1-Babu and A2-Pappathi respectively, for convenience) were tried by the Principal Sessions Court, Coimbatore in Sessions Case No.141 of 2000 for offences punishable under Section 498A and Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. A1-Babu was co...
Supreme Court Of India
Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs Udal And Others Etc
Judges: Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
02 July, 2013·G. S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved/dissatisfied with the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby he enhanced the amount of compensation payable to the landowners from Rs.28,15,356 per acre to Rs.37,40,000 per acre, the beneficiary of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Police, New Delhi & Anr vs Mehar SinghCommissioner Of Police, New Delhi & Anr vs Shani Kumar
Judges: G S Singhvi, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2013·(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. Leave granted in both the petitions.Page 1 22. In both the appeals the judgments of the Delhi High Court are under challenge. Appeal arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 38886 of 2012 is against Judgment dated 09/07/2012 passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No.3918 of 2012. ...
Supreme Court Of India
K C Bajaj And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi
02 July, 2013·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) Nos. 3358-64 of 2011 K.C. Bajaj and others …Appellants Versus Union of India and others …Respondents WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 3367-3368 of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Vikram Singh @ Vicky & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: T S Thakur, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
02 July, 2013·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. For a person found guilty of a capital offence and sentenced to death even by the highest Court of the land the options for reprieve are very limited. Once the conviction of the accused and the sentence awarded to him attains finality the prospects of judicial ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jasvinder Saini & Ors vs State ( Govt Of Nct Of Delhi )
Judges: T S Thakur, Ranjana Prakash Desai
02 July, 2013·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question that falls for consideration in this appeal by special leave is whether the trial Court was justified in framing a charge under Section 302 of the IPC 1 Page 1 against the appellants and whether the High Court was justified in affirming that orde...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.