M/S Swastik Gases P Ltd vs Indian Oil Corp Ltd Judgment R M Lodha, J Leave GrantedArisesSectionThe Above Question Arises In This Way The Ibp Company Limited ,CompanyThe ’S StandSent A NoticeUnder Diverse HeadsCompany 6 ThereafterAnother Notice Was Sent By The To The Company Invoking Arbitration Clause Wherein Name Of A Retired Judge Of The High Court Was Proposed As The ’S Arbitrator The Company Was Requested To Name Their Arbitrator
Judges: Madan B Lokur
03 July, 2013·Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Leave granted.2. While I agree with the conclusion arrived at by my learned Brother Justice Lodha, this judgment has been penned down to raise the question – is it really necessary for this Court to repeatedly affirm the legal position ad nauseam? I believe the law o...
Supreme Court Of India
Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya Appellan T - vs - State Of M P & Ors
Judges: B S Chauhan, Ibrahim Kalifulla
03 July, 2013·Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. This appeal is directed against the Division Bench decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, dated 20.03.2002, in W.P.No.1065 of 2001, in and by which, the Division Bench allowed the writ petition in part. The challenge in the writ petition was ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajinder Singh vs State Of Haryana
Judges: A K Patnaik, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
03 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.These two appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 9th December, 2005 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in two separate Criminal Appeal Nos. 392SB of 1995 and 151SB of 1995, whereby the learned Single...
Supreme Court Of India
Ranjit Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: A K Patnaik, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
03 July, 2013·SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th January, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 303DB of 2006. By its impugned judgment the Division Bench while acquitting one of ...
Supreme Court Of India
C H Suryanarayana vs Oriental Insurance Co Ltd & Anr
Judges: H L Dattu, Dipak Misra
03 July, 2013·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in M.F.A.No.21957/2009 (MV), dated 27.02.2012. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has reduced the compensation that was awarded by the Motor Acci...
Supreme Court Of India
Swarn Kaur vs Gurmukh Singh And Ors
Judges: Ibrahim Kalifulla
03 July, 2013·Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, dated 18.06.2008, in Crl.A.No.280 of 2005. The de facto complainant is the appellant. The respondents 1 to 5 were arrayed as accused 1 to 5 alon...
Supreme Court Of India
Kamlesh C Shah & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Vikramajit Sen, A K Sikri
03 July, 2013·1REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONI.A. NO. 3 OF 2012 INWRIT PETITION (C) NO. 342 OF 1999KAMLESH C. SHAH & ORS. PETITIONERS Vs.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, CJI.1. Chapter VIII-A, which was introduced into th...
Supreme Court Of India
C vs Francis vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Anil R Dave, Ranjana Prakash Desai
03 July, 2013·1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONREPORTABLESPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 31250 OF 2011C.V. Francis ...Petitioner Vs.Union of India & Ors. Respondents J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, CJI.1. The Petitioner, who has appeared in person, was employed ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nana Keshav Legad vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, Fakkir Mohamed Kalifulla
03 July, 2013·Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. These two appeals are against the common judgment of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, in Cri.A.No.611 of 2003, dated 16.01.2006.2. The appellant in Crl.A.No.1010 of 2008 is A4 and the appellants in Crl.A.No.1011 of 2008 are A2 and A3. In all, four accuse...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Swastik Gases P.Ltd vs Indian Oil Corp.Ltd
Judges: R M Lodha, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph
03 July, 2013·R.M. LODHA, J.Leave granted.2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave is, whether, in view of clause 18 of the consignment agency agreement (for short, ‘agreement’) dated 13.10.2002, the Calcutta High Court has exclusive jurisdiction in respect of the applic...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.