Britannia Industries Limited vs Punjab National Bank & Ors
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
17 April, 2013·1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7552 OF 2002 Britannia Industries Limited … Appellant Versus Punjab National Bank & Ors. … Respondents J U D G M E N T Aftab Alam,J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is directed agains...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Bharosey Lal Gupta(D) By Lr. and ... vs M/S Hindustan Petroleum ...
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, V Gopala Gowda
17 April, 2013·V. Gopala Gowda, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed by the appellants who are owners of the property questioning the correctness of the impugned judgment dated 04.07.2007 passed in SA No.1812 of 1988 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad wherein it has set aside the judgment and decree d...
Supreme Court Of India
Britania Industries Ltd vs Punjab National Bank and Ors
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
17 April, 2013·Aftab Alam,J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and decree dated April 3, 2001 passed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal No.114/1991. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench allowed the appeal preferred by Punjab National Bank (respondent no...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Tata Sky Ltd vs State Of M P And Others
Judges: Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
16 April, 2013·Aftab Alam, J.1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. All these appeals relate to the demand of entertainment tax raised by the Page 1 Government of Madhya Pradesh under the Madhya Pradesh Entertainment Duty and Advertisements Tax Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1936 Act”) ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gangappa Ningappa Ugarkohod vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
16 April, 2013·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.683 OF 2005 GANGAPPA NINGAPPA UGARKOHOD … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA … RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1064 OF 2005 AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.47 OF 2007 J U D G M E N T Aftab Alam...
Supreme Court Of India
Dilip vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: B S Chauhan, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
16 April, 2013·1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 4.11.2006 in Criminal Appeal No.1228 of 1992 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, by way of which it reversed the judgment and order of the Sessions Judge, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh dated 16.7.1992 in Sessions Tr...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Rajeshwar & Ors
Judges: Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
16 April, 2013·1 N0N-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.677 OF 2006 STATE OF U.P. … APPELLANT VERSUS RAJESHWAR & ORS. … RESPONDENTS J U D GM E N T Aftab Alam,J.1. This appeal by special leave, at the instance of the S...
Supreme Court Of India
Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd : vs : Nlc Indcoserve T U Sangam & Ors
Judges: H L Gokhale, Ranjan Gogoi
16 April, 2013·1. Heard Mr. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant and Mr. Singaravelan, counsel appearing for respondent No.1, Mr. Beno Bencigar, counsel appearing for respondent No.9 and Mr. Radhakrishnan, counsel for respondent No.14.2. Respondent No.1 had approached...
Supreme Court Of India
R K Jain vs Union Of India & Anr `
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
16 April, 2013·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2013(arising out of SLP(C)No.22609 of 2012)R.K. JAIN …. APPELLANTVERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ANR. ` ….RESPONDENTSJ UD G M E N TSUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave granted.2. In this appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Neyveli Lignite Corp.Ltd vs Nlc I.T.U. Sangam and Ors
Judges: H L Gokhale, Ranjan Gogoi
16 April, 2013·1. Heard Mr. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant and Mr. Singaravelan, counsel appearing for respondent No.1, Mr. Beno Bencigar, counsel appearing for respondent No.9 and Mr. Radhakrishnan, counsel for respondent No.14.2. Respondent No.1 had approached the Hig...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.