Venkatesh R vs Divisional Manager, Ksrtc
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, Ranjan Gogoi
26 November, 2012·1. Leave granted.2. The claimant is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation.3. According to the appellant, he suffered injury in a motor accident and fractured his leg. He filed an application for grant of compensation and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by its award dated 06.06.2005, granted a...
Supreme Court Of India
Padmakar Tukaram Bhavnagare And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
26 November, 2012·(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. Leave granted.Page 1 22. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the order dated 27/03/2012 passed on Criminal Application No. 15/2012 and order dated 04/05/2012 passed on Criminal Application (App.) No. 533/2012 in Criminal Application No. 15/2012 by...
Supreme Court Of India
Alok Kumar Pandit vs State Of Assam & Ors
Judges: G S Singhvi
26 November, 2012·1. Leave granted.2. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal filed against the order of the Division Bench of the Guwahati High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing the Assam Public Service Commission (for selection made by the short, ‘he Commissio...
Supreme Court Of India
Venkatesh vs Divisional Manager, K S R T C
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, Ranjan Gogoi
26 November, 2012·1. Leave granted.2. The claimant is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation.3. According to the appellant, he suffered injury in a motor accident and fractured his leg. He filed an application for grant of compensation and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by its award dated 06.06.2005, gra...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohan Lal vs State Of Haryana
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad, Ranjan Gogoi
26 November, 2012·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is aggrieved by his conviction and sentence.3. The appellant was put on trial for commission of the offence under Section 302 and various other sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Trial Court held him guilty under Sections 304 Part -I and 449 of the Indian ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jasvir Kaur vs State Of Punjab
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
26 November, 2012·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1961 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2162 of 2012) JASVIR KAUR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Leave granted.The appellant alon...
Supreme Court Of India
Bihar State Govt.Sec.School ... vs Bihar Edu.Ser.Assn.and Ors
Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, H L Gokhale
23 November, 2012·Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N Kripal Hon’ble. Mrs Justice Ruma Pal “Upon hearing the counsel the court made the following ORDER It is clear that the final direction which has been given to the Petitioner to implement the resolution dated 27th April, 1977 in the manner it is meant to be implemented. The pe...
Supreme Court Of India
The Question With Respect To The Approach The High Courts And The State Page 1 Governments Are Expected To Adopt Towards The Orders Passed, And The Interpretations Of Govt Resolutions Rendered By This Court The Question ArisesHerein Are As Follows :- The State Of Bihar ,These Two Appeals, Set Up A Three Member Committee ,Shri Saran Singh, Member Board Of Revenue, And Administrative Reforms Commissioner, As Its Chairman The Terms Of Reference Of This CommitteeGovernment Has Approved Junior Selection GradeThe Same Percentage Has Been Applied For Junior Selection Grade And Senior Selection Grade In The Bihar Engineering Service On This BasisFor Junior Selection Grade And Senior Selection Grade In The Bihar Engineering Service On This Basis, Requests Have Been Coming From Various State Services Associations That Due To Lack Of Opportunity For Promotion In Their Cadres, There Is Stagnation ,Hence, Keeping In View The Strength And Present Promotional Avenues In Various State Service Cadres, To Analyse The Problem Of Stagnation And To Recommend Means To Tackle This Problem And Page 2 Promotional Opportunities, A Committee Of The Following Officers Is Constituted :- ( 1 ) Member, Board Of Revenue-Chairman ( 2 ) Chairman, Public Grievances Bureau - MemberBoardFinance Commissioner - Member” 4 The Committee Drew Its Conclusions On The Basis Of The Facts And Figures Furnished By Various Departments As Stated In The Report
Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, H L Gokhale
23 November, 2012·Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N Kripal Hon’ble. Mrs Justice Ruma Pal “Upon hearing the counsel the court made the following ORDER It is clear that the final direction which has been given to the Petitioner to implement the resolution dated 27th April, 1977 in the manner it is meant to be implemented....
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman, Lic Of India & Ors vs A Masilamani
Judges: B S Chauhan, Jagdish Singh Khehar
23 November, 2012·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.Leave granted.This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 10.1.2011, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No. 7 of 2011, by way of which, the Division Bench affirmed the judgment and order dated 17.2.2010, passed by the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nasirkhan Mahemoodkhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: H L Dattu, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
23 November, 2012·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.956 of 2007, dated 24.8.2009. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has upheld the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.