Om Prakash Asati vs State Of U P & Ors
Judges: Asok Kumar Ganguly, Jagdish Singh Khehar
13 January, 2012·“REPORTABLE”IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) Nos. 13896-13897 of 2008 Om Prakash Asati …. Petitioner Versus State of U.P. & Ors. …. Respondents J U D G M E N T JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.1. The petitioner her...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Flex Engineering Limited — vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, — U P
Judges:
13 January, 2012·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 875 of 2008, 10759 of 2010 and 6501 of 2011.2. This batch of appeals, by grant of leave, arises out of judgments dated 26th August, 2002 in C.E.R. No. 11 of 2001, 11th April, 2007 in C.E.A. No. 10 of 2004, 8th September, 2009 in C.E.A. No. 6 of 2003 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Food Corporation Of India & Ors — vs Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari — Sangh & Anr
Judges:
13 January, 2012·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment dated 23rd May, 2002, rendered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu in S.W.P No. 1470 of 1994. By the impugned judgment, while declaring Circular No.40 of 1985, dated 29th July, 1985, which accorded monetar...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, — Bangalore-Ii vs M/S Osnar Chemical Pvt Ltd —
Judges:
13 January, 2012·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. This batch of appeals by the revenue, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short “the Act”) arises out of final orders dated 23rd December, 2008 in Appeal No. E/379/2007; 25th September, 2008 in Appeal Nos. Excise/522 & 523/2007 and 28th October, 2009 in...
Supreme Court Of India
Commr.Of Cen.Exic.Ii Bangalore vs M/S Osnar Chemical P.Ltd
Judges: D K Jain, Asok Kumar Ganguly
13 January, 2012·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. This batch of appeals by the revenue, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the Act") arises out of final orders dated 23rd December, 2008 in Appeal No. E/379/2007; 25th September, 2008 in Appeal Nos. Excise/522 & 523/2007 and 28th October, 2009 in Appeal ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Flex Engineering Ltd vs Commnr. Of Central Excise, U.P
Judges: D K Jain, Asok Kumar Ganguly
13 January, 2012·D.K. JAIN, J.:11. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 875 of 2008, 10759 of 2010 and 6501 of 2011.2. This batch of appeals, by grant of leave, arises out of judgments dated 26th August, 2002 in C.E.R. No. 11 of 2001, 11th April, 2007 in C.E.A. No. 10 of 2004, 8th September, 2009 in C.E.A. No. 6 of 2003...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. I.O.C.L vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: A K Patnaik, Anil R Dave
13 January, 2012·A. K. PATNAIK, J.CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4530-4532 OF 2005:These are appeals under Section 35L (b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 15.03.2005 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai, (for short "the Tribunal").2. The facts very briefly ar...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, VadodaraM/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Lucknow
Judges: A K Patnaik, Anil R Dave
13 January, 2012·ReportableIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4530-4532 OF 2005 M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. … Appellant Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara … Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8048 OF 2004 M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. … ...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab & Sind Bank vs M/S C S Company & Ors
Judges: Swatanter Kumar, Ranjana Prakash Desai
13 January, 2012·(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. The appellant – Punjab & Sind Bank (for short, “the plaintiff-bank”) has challenged in this appeal, judgment and order dated 4/6/2003 passed by the Kerala High Court whereby the appeal filed by original defendants 1, 2, 4, 7 and 8 challenging the judgment and decre...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhu vs State Of Kerala
Judges: Asok Kumar Ganguly, Jagdish Singh Khehar
13 January, 2012·JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.1. The appellant herein, Madhu Kalikutty Panicker (hereinafter referred to as “Madhu”) was charged along with Sibi Bhaskaran (hereinafter referred to as “Sibi”) for offences punishable under Section 302 and 392 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, for having robbed ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.