Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Judges: R M Lodha, H L Gokhale
04 January, 2012·R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned senior counsel for the appellant, Mr. Shankar Chillarge, learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra and Mr. Suhas Kadam, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.3. On January 10, 2011, the District Magistrate, Jalgaon in ex...
Supreme Court Of India
Coal Mines P F Commr Thr Board Of Trustee vs Ramesh Chandra Jha
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar
04 January, 2012·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.41 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.5827 of 2011) COAL MINES P.F. COMMR. THR. BOARD OF TRUSTEE … APPELLANT Vs.RAMESH CHANDRA JHA … RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. Leave granted.2. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Coal Mines P.F.Commr.Tr.Board Of ... vs Ramesh Chandra Jha
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar, J Chelameswar
04 January, 2012·ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant herein is the Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner through the Board of Trustees, constituted under Section 3 of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions 2 Act, CMPF Organisation, Dhanbad. The Respondent was appointed as a Lower ...
Supreme Court Of India
Darshan Lal Nagpal ( Dead ) By L Rs vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Others
Judges: Mukhopadhaya
03 January, 2012·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11169 OF 2011 Darshan Lal Nagpal (dead) by L.Rs. … Appellants versus Government of NCT of Delhi and others … Respondents J U D G M E N T G. S. Singhvi, J.1. The questions which arise f...
Supreme Court Of India
Darshan Lal Nagpal and Ors vs Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi and Ors
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
03 January, 2012·G. S. Singhvi, J.1. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether the Government of NCT of Delhi could have invoked Section 17(1) and (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') and dispensed with the rule of hearing embodied in Section 5A(2) thereof for the...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.