Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai vs Thomas Mathew & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, Chelameswar
09 April, 2012·P. Sathasivam,J.1) Delay condoned.2) Leave granted.3) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.02.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in First Appeal No. 223 of 2009 whereby the High Court disposed of the appeal filed by the appellant herein...
Supreme Court Of India
Premji Nathu vs State Of Gujarat And Another
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
09 April, 2012·G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Whether the application submitted by the appellant under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) was barred by time and Civil Judge (Senior Division), Junagadh (hereinafter described as the ‘Reference Court’) rightly refused to entertain his ...
Supreme Court Of India
Maniben Devraj Shah vs Municipal Corporation Of Brihan Mumbai
Judges: G S Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
09 April, 2012·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2970-2971 OF 2012 Maniben Devraj Shah … Appellant(s) Versus Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai … Respondent J U D G M E N T G. S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether the cause shown by Munic...
Supreme Court Of India
The Judgement And Order(S ) In Crla No 602/2006 Dated 25 - Mar-09 Of The High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad ) Fazal vs State Of U P (
Judges:
09 April, 2012·HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.S.Rathi, Adv.Ms.Kusum, Adv. Mr.Prabhat Kumar, Adv.For Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta II,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ratnakar Dash, Sr.Adv.Mr.Vikrant Yadav, Adv.For Mr. Kamlendra Mishra,Adv.UPON hearing counsel th...
Supreme Court Of India
Mun.Corp.Of Gr.Mumbai vs Thomas Mathew and Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, J Chelameswar
09 April, 2012·P. Sathasivam,J.10.02.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in First Appeal No. 223 of 2009 whereby the High Court disposed of the appeal filed by the appellant herein with certain modifications in the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in Notice of Motion No. 4026 of 2003...
Supreme Court Of India
Maheshwari Prasad & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & OrsSri Prayag Mehra vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar
04 April, 2012·REPORTABL E IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3393 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.3655 of 2007) MAHESHWARI PRASAD & ORS. … APPELLANTS Vs.STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. … RESPONDENTS WITHCIVIL APPEAL NOS.3394-3395 OF 2012(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.14...
Supreme Court Of India
Myla Venkateswarlu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai
04 April, 2012·NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 611 OF 2012 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6774 of 2011] MYLA VENKATESWARLU … APPELLANT Vs.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH … RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI...
Supreme Court Of India
Chaugule vs Bhagwat
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar
04 April, 2012·REPORTABL E IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3373 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.5776 of 2012) CHAUGULE … APPELLANT Vs.BHAGWAT … RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The Appellant herein was elected ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhushan Kumar & Anr vs State ( Nct Of Delhi ) & Anr
Judges: P Sathasivam, Chelameswar
04 April, 2012·P.Sathasivam,J.1) Leave granted.2) These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 30.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl.M.C. Nos. 3376 & 3375 of 2009 whereby the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants herein for quashing the summoning order...
Supreme Court Of India
2 L & T Uttaranchal Hydro Power P Ltd vs Jaya Prakash Dabral & Ors
Judges: H L Dattu, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
04 April, 2012·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2883 OF 2012 L & T UTTARANCHAL HYDRO POWER P.LTD. APPELLANT VERSUS JAYA PRAKASH DABRAL & ORS. RESPONDENTS O R D E R Dismissed.By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has decided the only issue with regard to the loc...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.