State Of Jharkhand : vs : Vishwanath Dubey & Ors
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
26 September, 2011·1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. The Letters Patent Appeal filed by State of Jharkhand was dismissed by the High Court as being defective. The Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi has observed that none appeared for the State...
Supreme Court Of India
Supreme Court Bar Association And Others vs B D KaushikSupreme Court Bar Association vs A K Manchanda
Judges: M Panchal, H L Gokhale
26 September, 2011·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3401 OF 2003Supreme Court Bar Associationand others ... AppellantsVersusB.D. Kaushik ... RespondentWITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3402 OF 2003Supreme Court Bar Association ... AppellantVe...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S L N Gadodia & Sons & Anr ( S ) vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ( S )
Judges: H L Gokhale
26 September, 2011·H.L. GOKHALE J.This Special Leave Petition raises the question as to whether the respondent herein had erred in clubbing the two appellant concerns for the purposes of applying the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Prov...
Supreme Court Of India
Lalit Kumar Modi vs Board Of Control For Cricket In India & Ors
Judges: J M Panchal, H L Gokhale
26 September, 2011·H.L. Gokhale J.These three Special Leave Petitions seek to challenge three orders passed by three different benches of Bombay High Court, on the proceedings initiated by the appellant against the first respondent Board of Control for Cricket in India (hereinafter referred to either as ‘first respond...
Supreme Court Of India
R Saragapani ( Dead ) Through L Rs vs The Special Tahsildar, Karur-Dindigul Broadguage LineSoundararajan ( Dead ) Through L Rs vs The Special Tahsildar, Karur-Dindigul Broadguage Line
Judges: G S Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly
23 September, 2011·G.S. Singhvi, J.1. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 5.10.2001 of the Madras High Court whereby the compensation determined by the Reference Court vide award dated 2.4.1993 passed in LAOP Nos. 29 and 30 of 1988 was substantially reduced.2. On a requisition sent by Executive Engineer ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P & Ors vs M/S Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd & Anr
Judges: P Sathasivam
23 September, 2011·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4708-4709 OF 2002 State of U.P. & Ors. … Appellants Vs.M/s Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd. & Anr. … Respondents With Civil Appeal No.4710 of 2002 Civil Appeal No.4711 of 2002 Civil Appeal...
Supreme Court Of India
Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M Panchal, H L Gokhale
23 September, 2011·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1845 OF 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 5908 of 2010) Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur ... Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent J U D G M E N T J.M. PANCHAL, J.Leave g...
Supreme Court Of India
A B Bhaskara Rao vs Inspector Of Police, Cbi Visakhapatnam
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
23 September, 2011·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 650 OF 2008 A.B. Bhaskara Rao Appellant(s) Versus Inspector of Police, CBI Visakhapatnam Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T P. Sathasivam, J.1) This appeal is directed against the final j...
Supreme Court Of India
Kanwar Singh Saini vs High Court Of
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
23 September, 2011·Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.1. ‘Liberty’ - the most cherished fundamental right, a basic human right, a “transcendental”, inalienable, and `primordial’ right, should not be put in peril without following the procedure prescribed by law and in a casual and cavalier manner. Instant case is an example where a...
Supreme Court Of India
Dinbandhu vs State Of Bihar & Anr
Judges:
23 September, 2011·Leave granted.Heard counsel for the parties.The appellant, who is an accused in a complaint case under sections 192, 193, 196, 200, 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code, was granted anticipatory bail by the High Court by order dated May 06, 2010 in Crl.M.C.No. 12306 of 2010. The bail order w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.