Rajesh Kumar - vs - State Through Govt Of Nct Of
Judges: D K Jain, Asok Kumar Ganguly
28 September, 2011·GANGULY, J.1. Leave granted.2. These Criminal Appeals are preferred from the judgment of conviction under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter “IPC”) and the penalty of death sentence, delivered on 6th August, 2009 by the High Court of Delhi in Death Sentence Reference no. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bedanga Talukdar vs Saifudaullah Khan & Ors
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar
28 September, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 4th March, 2010 in Writ Petition (C) No. 950 of 2010 and impugned judgment and order dated 2nd July, 2010 in Writ Petition (C) No.3382 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Guwahati, allowing the w...
Supreme Court Of India
Antonio Lobo & Anr vs Felix Fernandes & Ors
Judges: R M Lodha, Jagdish Singh Khehar
28 September, 2011·Original plaintiffs (appellants herein) are in appeal, by Special Leave. They are aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court of Bombay at Goa whereby the learned Single Judge of that Court partly allowed the appeal of the defendants (respondents herein) and confined the decree passed by the First ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nasib Hussain Sidi and Ors vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Cyriac Joseph, Swatanter Kumar
28 September, 2011·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of an order passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad whereby conviction of the appellants for offences punishable under Sections 325, 506(2), 333, 342 and 114 IPC has been affirmed and the -sentence reduced to imprisonment for a perio...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Union Of India andOrs.;
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
27 September, 2011·A. K. PATNAIK, J.This dispute between the State of Himachal Pradesh (Plaintiff), on the one hand, and the Union of India (defendant No.1), State of Punjab (defendant No.2), State of Haryana (defendant No.3), State of Rajasthan (defendant No.4) and Union Territory of Chandigarh (defendant No.5), on t...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Ultratech Cemco Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra and Anr
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
27 September, 2011·J U G D M E N T R. V. Raveendran J.The appellant (the term `appellant' refers to M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. till date of its demerger in 2004 and thereafter to M/s. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd.) obtained a mining lease for limestone from the Government of Maharashtra, as per lease deed dated 12.2.1980. Unde...
Supreme Court Of India
Ultra Tech Cement Ltd ( Earlier Ultratech Cemco Ltd ) vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
27 September, 2011·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.864 OF 2005 Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. … Appellant (earlier Ultratech Cemco Ltd.) Vs.State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents J U G D M E N T R. V. Raveendran J.The appellant (the te...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Thermax Ltd & Ors vs K M Johny & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
27 September, 2011·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1868 OF 2011(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 590 of 2008M/s Thermax Ltd. & Ors. Appellant(s) Versus K.M. Johny & Ors. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave g...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt Har Devi Asnani vs State Of Rajasthan & Others
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
27 September, 2011·A. K. PATNAIK, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant purchased Plot No. A-7 situated in the Housing Scheme No.12, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, of Krishna Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Limited by a registered Sale Deed dated 16.05.2007 for a consideration of Rs.18 lacs. The Sale Deed was executed on a...
Supreme Court Of India
K Balarama Raju vs Ch vs Subramanya Sarma & OrsMohd Sanullah Ansari & Anr vs Ch vs Subramanya Sarma & OrsHigh Court Of A P vs Ch vs Subramanya Sarma & Ors J U D G E M E NA P vs Ch vs Subramanya Sarma & OrsL GokhaleThreePassed By A Division Bench Of The Andhra Pradesh High Court AllowingFiled By Ch vs Subramanya Sarma Who Is Joined As No 1 In All These Three MattersThe Aforesaid Writ All The Three And The First Are Employees Of The Andhra Pradesh High Court ,Was Concerning Their Seniority And Promotion The Said Writ Challenged The Decision Of The Andhra Pradesh High Court On Its Administrative Side Granting Seniority To These Three Over The First The Writ Having Been Allowed
Judges: H L Gokhale
26 September, 2011·Leave granted.2. These three appeals arise from the judgment and Order dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing Writ Petition No. 11920/2008 filed by Ch. V. Subramanya Sarma who is joined as respondent No. 1 in all these three matters. The appellant in...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.