M/S Royal Orchid Hotels Limited And Another vs G Jayarama Reddy And OthersKarnataka State Tourism Development Corporation vs G Jayarama Reddy And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi, Mukhopadhaya
29 September, 2011·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7588 OF 2005 M/s. Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and another … Appellants Versus G. Jayarama Reddy and others … Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL NO.7589 OF 2005 Karnataka State Tourism Development Cor...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Defence vs Rabinder Singh
Judges: H L Gokhale
29 September, 2011·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCivil Appeal No. 7241 OF 2002Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Defence … Appellants Versus Rabinder Singh … Respondent J U D G E M E N T H.L. Gokhale J.This appeal by ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Ntpc Ltd vs M P State Electricity Board & Ors
Judges: H L Gokhale, M Panchal
29 September, 2011·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCivil Appeal No. 2451 OF 2007WithCivil Appeal No. 2452 of 2007WithCivil Appeal No. 2493 of 2007WithCivil Appeal No. 3972 of 2007WithCivil Appeal No. 4231 of 2007M/s NTPC Ltd. …Appellant Versus M.P. State El...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamaluddin vs State Of Jammu & Kashmir And Ors
Judges: J M Panchal, H L Gokhale
29 September, 2011·H.L. Gokhale J.This appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dated 24.2.2004 in LPA No. 133/2003, confirming the order dated 8.9.2003 passed by a learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition No. SWP 994/2002 filed by the appellant.Fac...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr
Judges: M Panchal, Deepak Verma, B S Chauhan
29 September, 2011·J.M. PANCHAL, J.1. The respondent Narmada Bachao Andolan (hereinafter called as NBA) has filed the aforesaid applications for expunging certain adverse remarks made in paragraphs 129-132 and 145 of the judgment and order in the aforesaid civil appeals dated 11.5.2011.2. These applications have been ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamaluddin vs State Of J.andK. and Ors
Judges: J M Panchal, H L Gokhale
29 September, 2011·H.L. Gokhale J.This appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dated 24.2.2004 in LPA No. 133/2003, confirming the order dated 8.9.2003 passed by a learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition No. SWP 994/2002 filed by the appellant.Fac...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India and Ors vs Rabinder Singh
Judges: J M Panchal, H L Gokhale
29 September, 2011·J U D G E M E N T H.L. Gokhale J.This appeal by Union of India through the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Defence seeks to challenge the judgment and order passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in L.P.A.No.996 of 1991 dated 2.7.2001 whereby the Division Bench has allo...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajesh Kumar vs State Th:Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
Judges: D K Jain, Asok Kumar Ganguly
28 September, 2011·GANGULY, J.1. Leave granted.2. These Criminal Appeals are preferred from the judgment of conviction under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter "IPC") and the penalty of death sentence, delivered on 6th August, 2 2009 by the High Court of Delhi in Death Sentence Reference no. 2/2007 and ...
Supreme Court Of India
Baljinder Singh @ Bittu vs State Of Punjab
Judges: Cyriac Joseph, T S Thakur
28 September, 2011·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 5th October, 2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of -four years and a fine of Rs.5,000/...
Supreme Court Of India
Nasib Hussain Siddi & Ors vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Cyriac Joseph, T S Thakur
28 September, 2011·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of an order passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad whereby conviction of the appellants for offences punishable under Sections 325, 506(2), 333, 342 and 114 IPC has been affirmed and the -sentence reduced to imprisonment for a perio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.