Kusum and Ors vs Satbir and Ors
Judges: G S Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly
02 March, 2011·GANGULY, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the claimant, learned counsel for the insurance company and also the learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2, the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle.3. In this case the claim for compensation filed by the appellants was concurren...
Supreme Court Of India
Md Habibur Rahman vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
01 March, 2011·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 610 OF 2011 (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO.1894 OF 2010) MD.HABIBUR RAHMAN ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ... RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Leave granted.Heard learned couns...
Supreme Court Of India
Somashekhar A S vs United India Insurance Co Ltd
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
01 March, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. We have gone through the Award of the Tribunal and find that the compensation had been determined on the basis of the age factor as well as the disability of 60 per cent as would be clear from paragraph 27 of the order of the Commi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of Bikaner & Jaipur vs Nemi Chand Nalwaya
Judges: R V Raveendran
01 March, 2011·R. V. Raveendran J.,The respondent was employed as a clerk in the Kalindri branch of the appellant Bank. He was issued a charge-sheet dated 30.8.1988. The two charges against him are extracted below :(i) On 14.10.1987, you disclosed the balance of SB Account No.1025 of Shri Dharamchand Nathaji lyi...
Supreme Court Of India
Basappa @ Basavaraj vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
01 March, 2011·1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The courts below have found, as a matter of fact, that the chain of circumstances led to the conclusion that the appellant who was the husband of the deceased was unmistakably guilty of the charges framed against him. Admittedly, the extra judicia...
Supreme Court Of India
M.Mohan vs State Tr.Dy.Supdt.Of Police
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Surinder Singh Nijjar
01 March, 2011·1. Leave granted in both the matters.2. Since the facts of both the appeals are common, therefore, these appeals are decided by a common judgment. 2 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 612 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.2687/2010)3. We deem it proper to take the facts of Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (C...
Supreme Court Of India
M Mohan vs The State Represented By The Deputy Superintendent Of PoliceVelmurugan & Anr vs The State Represented By The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Surinder Singh Nijjar
01 March, 2011·Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. Leave granted in both the matters.2. Since the facts of both the appeals are common, therefore, these appeals are decided by a common judgment.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 612 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.2687/2010)3. We deem it proper to take the facts of Criminal Appeal ari...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar Todi vs Kishwar Jahan & Ors
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
01 March, 2011·1) Leave granted.2) These appeals are directed against the common judgment and final order dated 18.05.2010 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta in M.A.T. Nos. 703, 895, 704, 713, 714 and 744 of 2008 whereby the CBI was directed to start investigation afresh in accordance with ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gvk Inds Ltd & Anr vs The Income Tax Officer & Anr
Judges: Surinder Singh Nijjar, Swatanter Kumar
01 March, 2011·B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J:1. In any federal or quasi federal nation-state, legislative powers are distributed territorially, and legislative competence is often delineated in terms of matters or fields. The latter may be thought of as comprising of aspects or causes that exist independently in th...
Supreme Court Of India
Somashekar A.S vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd.and ...
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
01 March, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. We have gone through the Award of the Tribunal and find that the compensation had been determined on the basis of the age factor as well as the disability of 60 per cent as would be clear from paragraph 27 of the order of the Commi...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.