Union Of India & Ors — vs Vartak Labour Union —
Judges:
04 March, 2011·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. Challenge in these appeals, by special leave, is to the judgments and orders dated 27th March, 2001 and 22nd January, 2003 delivered by a Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati in Writ Appeal No. 548 of 1996 whereby it has directed appellant No.1 viz. Union of India to...
Supreme Court Of India
Vs Raveendran And A K Patnaik, Jj ] [2011] 6 Scr 1 The Order Of The Court
Judges:
04 March, 2011·R. V. RAVEENDRAN J.1. Leave granted.2. The first respondent (‘Society’ for short) requested the state government (second respondent) to provide a Low Income Group housing scheme for the benefit of its members who were the employees of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The state government direct...
Supreme Court Of India
H. Siddiqui (D) By Lr vs A. Ramalingam
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
04 March, 2011·Dr. B. S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 3.2.2004 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Regular First Appeal No. 265 of 1999.2. FACTS:(A) The Appellant who had been inducted as a tenant at an initial stage filed suit No. 30/1981 on 1...
Supreme Court Of India
K.K. Baskaran vs State Rep By Its ...
Judges: Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
04 March, 2011·1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.3. Financial swindling and duping of gullible investors/depositors is not unique to India. It has been referred to in Charles Dicken's novel `Little Dorrit', in which Mr. Merdle sets up a Ponzi scheme resulting in loss of th...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Hyderabad Engineering ... vs State Of A.P
Judges: D K Jain, H L Dattu
04 March, 2011·H.L. Dattu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.06.2002, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Tax Revision Case No. 54 of 1991. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the Revision Pet...
Supreme Court Of India
Pesara Pushpamala Reddy vs G Veera Swamy And OthersR S Murthy vs German Reddy & Anr
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
04 March, 2011·A. K. PATNAIK, J.Delay in filing of SLP (C) No.23821 of 2008 is condoned.2. Leave granted.3. These appeals are against two separate orders dated 04.06.2007 and 05.06.2007 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition No.8613 of 2002 and Writ Petition No.18642 of 2...
Supreme Court Of India
K K Baskaran - vs - State Rep By Its Secretary, Tamil Nadu & Ors
Judges: Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
04 March, 2011·1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.3. Financial swindling and duping of gullible investors/depositors is not unique to India. It has been referred to in Charles Dicken’s novel ‘Little Dorrit’, in which Mr. Merdle sets up a Ponzi scheme resulting in loss of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Sant Singh vs Sukhdev Singh And Others
Judges: G S Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly
04 March, 2011·GANGULY, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant-claimant, Sant Singh, on 8.11.2004, was going to Dera Bassi from Chandigarh as a pillion-rider on the scooter (No. CH-01-P- 7028) driven by one Nahar Singh, at about 1.30 PM, when the first respondent (driving Tata 709 No. PB- 03-E-4525) came from the...
Supreme Court Of India
T.Nadu Housing Board vs Service Society and Anr
Judges: R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik
04 March, 2011·R. V. Raveendran J.1. Leave granted.2. The first respondent (b�Societyb� for short) requested the state government (second respondent) to provide a Low Income Group housing scheme for the benefit of its members who were the employees of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The state government directed t...
Supreme Court Of India
Prema & Anr vs Deva Rao & Ors
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, Anil R Dave
03 March, 2011· ANIL R. DAVE, J.1 Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the common Judgment delivered by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore on 6th December, 2007 in RFA No. 1067/2006 and RFA No. 1068/2006, these appeals have been filed by the original plaintiff and defendant no.3.3. For the sake of conv...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.