Regional Institute Of Printing Technology, Kolkata : vs : Arup Kumar Mookherjee & Ors
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
11 July, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. The appellant has already paid Rs.10,56,410/- to respondent No.1 towards the pay and allowances for the period 1.4.1974 to 31.12.1994. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent<table cellspacing="0" style="b...
Supreme Court Of India
Nandiesha Reddy vs Mrs Kavitha MaheshN S Nandish Reddy vs Mrs Kavitha Mahesh
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
08 July, 2011·CHANDRMAULI KR.PRASAD,J.1. Nandiesha Reddy got elected to the Karnataka Assembly in the general election from K.R.Pura Assembly Constituency held on 10th of May, 2008. His election was challenged by Kavitha Mahesh, inter alia, on the ground that her nomination was illegally not accepted by the Retur...
Supreme Court Of India
Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd vs Jindal Exports LtdFuerst Day Lawson Ltd vs Jindal Exports LtdJindal Exports Limited vs Fuerst Day LawsonIte India P Ltd vs Mukesh Sharma & OrsShivnath Rai Harnarain India Company vs Glencore Grain RotterdamShivnath Rai Harnarain India Company vs Glencore Grain RotterdamTinna Finex Ltd vs National Ability S A & Anr 3Sea Stream Navigation Ltd vs Lmj International Ltd
Judges: Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
08 July, 2011·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.11945 OF 2010 FUERST DAY LAWSON LTD. … PETITIONER VERSUS JINDAL EXPORTS LTD. … RESPONDENT WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13625 OF 2010 FUERST DAY LAWSON LTD. ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Delhi vs Ram Avtar @ Rama
Judges: B S Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar J.Ingenuity of counsel sometimes results in formulation propositions, which appear at the first flush to be legally sound and relatable to recognized cannons of criminal jurisprudence. When examined in greater depth, their rationale is nothing but illusory; and the argum...
Supreme Court Of India
Om Prakash vs State Of Haryana
Judges: B S Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar J.The two accused Om Prakash (hereinafter referred as ‘the appellant’) and Jai Prakash were committed to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge at Jagadhri vide order dated 30th September, 1994 to face trial in the case of Jai Prakash under Sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(g) of the Indi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Goraksha Ambaji Adsul AndGoraksha Ambaji Adsul vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: B S Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar, J.The learned trial court, while weighing the mitigating and aggravating circumstances and keeping in mind the principle of proportionality of sentence or what it termed as “just- desert” for the brutal and diabolical killing of three innocent family members, formed an opinion that ...
Supreme Court Of India
Prem Parkash @ Lillu and Anr vs State Of Haryana
Judges: B S Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar, J.Three accused, namely Dharambir @ Pappu, Prem Prakash @ Lillu and Herchand @ Poley, were charged for an offence punishable under Sections 366 and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Upon trial, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, by judgment a...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagdish Prasad vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors
Judges: B S Chauhan
07 July, 2011·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NOs. 5102-5103 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP(C ) No. 20693-20694 OF 2009)Jagdish Prasad … Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. … RespondentsJ U D G M E N TSwatanter Kumar J.Leave granted.Thes...
Supreme Court Of India
Nand Kishore vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: B S Chauhan
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dated 26th August, 2004 affirming the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Datia, Madhya Pradesh dated 30th December, 1998 convicting all the three accused (appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Noor Sk Bhikan vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Judges: B S Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar
07 July, 2011·Swatanter Kumar, J.The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16th August, 2001 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad, declining the reliefs prayed for by the appellant, however, still issuing certain directions. The appellant had approached th...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.