Rambilas Singh vs State Of U.P
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr Prasad
24 February, 2011·1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. There were seven accused initially in the matter. A4 died during the course of the trial and six acused, accordingly, were brought to trial. During the recording of the evidence, five of the eye witnesses Shiv Ratan Singh (PW 1), Mahadeo Singh ...
Supreme Court Of India
Tukaram & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad
24 February, 2011·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 902 OF 2007 TUKARAM & ORS. .. APPELLANT(S) vs.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1195 OF 2007 WITH (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No. 1935 of 2011) O R D E R CRIMI...
Supreme Court Of India
Swapan Kumar Senapati vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: Chandramauli Kr Prasad
24 February, 2011·1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. On the 22nd July, 1992 at about 11:00a.m. Satkari Senapati, hereinafter referred to as the deceased, aged about 76 years was assaulted by his nephew Swapan Kumar Senapati, the appellant herein, in the presence of, amongst others, P.W. 3 and P....
Supreme Court Of India
Brij Pal Bhargava & Ors vs State Of U P & Ors
Judges: V S Sirpurkar, Anil R Dave
23 February, 2011·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. Land owners – appellants have challenged the judgment of Allahabad High Court, challenging the dismissal of their petition, whereby they had challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called ...
Supreme Court Of India
Haryana State Warehousing Corporation vs Jagat Ram & AnrRam Kumar vs Jagat Ram & Anr
Judges: Cyriac Joseph
23 February, 2011·CYRIAC JOSEPH, J.1. I had the benefit of reading the judgment of my learned brother Altamas Kabir, J. I respectfully agree with the decision to dismiss the Special Leave Petitions. However, I wish to support and supplement the decision through this separate but concurring judgment.2. The dispute in...
Supreme Court Of India
Ivo Agnelo Santimano Fernandes & Ors - vs - Government Of Goa & Anr
Judges: G S Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly
23 February, 2011·GANGULY, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. A notification dated 6.09.1984 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter, ‘the Act’), was issued for acquisition of land at Sanguem, Goa, for the construction of a sports complex. The concerned dispute relates to land in Survey Nos....
Supreme Court Of India
Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar
Judges: V S Sirpurkar, Anil R Dave
23 February, 2011·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos. 1516 and 1517 of 2004. Five accused persons have filed these appeals, they being Amerika Rai (original accused No. 1), Darbesh Rai (original accused No. 2), Mithilesh Rai (original accused No. 4), Sanjay Rai (original accused N...
Supreme Court Of India
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs Off-Shore Enterprises Inc
Judges: A K Patnaik
23 February, 2011·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4368 OF 2005 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Appellant Versus Off-Shore Enterprises Inc Respondent O R D E R R. V. Raveendran J., Under a contract dated 14.7.1981 between appell...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajalingam vs State Rep By Inspector Of Police
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi
23 February, 2011·1. Three accused, including the sole appellant herein, were put on trial for offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alternatively under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. The Trial Court convicted the appellant under Section 302 and other two accused under Section 302...
Supreme Court Of India
Mehmood Rahmat Ullah Khan & Anr ( S ) vs Niyaz Ahmad Khan ( With Prayer For Interim Relief And Office Report
Judges: Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
23 February, 2011·ITEM NO.107 Court No.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1264 OF 2009 MEHMOOD RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN & ANR. Appellant (s) VERSUS NIYAZ AHMAD KHAN Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.