Maloth Somaraju vs State Of A P
Judges: V S Sirpurkar, T S Thakur
17 August, 2011·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Appellant Maloth Somaraju challenges the judgment of the High Court whereby the High Court allowed the State appeal challenging the acquittal by the Trial Court. He was tried for the offence punishable under Section 302, IPC on the allegation that on 15.05.1999 at about 2 a.m. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Amitava Banerjee @ Amit @ Bappa Banerjee vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: V S Sirpurkar, T S Thakur
17 August, 2011·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. This appeal by special leave arises out of an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta whereby the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 302, 364 and 201 of the IPC and the sentence of life imprisonment awarded to him have been...
Supreme Court Of India
Indusind Media & Commun Ltd & Anr vs Mamlatdar & Ors
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, Anil R Dave
17 August, 2011·ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the Judgement and Order dated 13.5.2010, delivered in SCA Nos. 13586-13589/2009 by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, these appeals have been filed by the appellants-assessees.3. The facts in a nutshell are that the appellants are engaged i...
Supreme Court Of India
Badri Prasad vs Mahesh Kumar & Ors
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Gyan Sudha Misra
17 August, 2011·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 328 OF 2003 BADRI PRASAD ..... APPELLANT VERSUS MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.We are not inclined to interfere in this matter as the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commnr Of Customs Excise, New Delhi vs M/S Living Media ( India ) Ltd
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, Anil R Dave
17 August, 2011·Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.1. The Civil Appeal Nos. 8627-8628 of 2002 are filed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter for short referred to as “CEGAT”) on 23.1.2002, however, Civil Appeal No. 2959 of 2008, Civil Appeal No. 4751 of...
Supreme Court Of India
The Registrar General, High Court Of Madras vs M Manickam And Ors
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, Anil R Dave
17 August, 2011·Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The present appeals are filed against the judgments and orders dated 15.03.2007 and 21.07.2007 in Second Appeal No. 1064 of 2005, and Review Petition No. 19 of 2007, respectively, passed by the Madras High Court whereby it dismissed the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Raviraj Udupa vs M/S. United India Ins. Co.Ltd. And ...
Judges: G S Singhvi, H L Dattu
16 August, 2011·Raviraj Udupa v.M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.(CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7074-75 OF 2011) August 16, 2011 [G. S. SINGHVI AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] [2011] 10 SCR 276 The Order of the Court was delivered by H.L. Datttu, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis and peru...
Supreme Court Of India
Varsha vs Divisional Caste ...
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Gyan Sudha Misra
16 August, 2011·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. It is alleged that the appellant belongs to Kunbi caste which is recognized as Other Backward Caste in the State of Maharashtra. She got married on 3.9.1992 to Sayyad Arif Sayyad Munir who belongs to 'Muslim Attar' caste which ...
Supreme Court Of India
Coromandel Indag Products ( P ) Ltd vs Garuda Chit & Trading Co P Ltd & Anr
Judges: H L Gokhale
16 August, 2011·P.Sathasivam,J.1) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and decree dated 17.02.2003 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in O.S.A. No. 163 of 1994 whereby the appeal filed by the respondents herein was allowed.2) Brief facts:(a) The appellant is a Priva...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Uttaranchal and Anr vs Sunil Kumar Vaish and Ors
Judges: G S Singhvi, K S Radhakrishnan
16 August, 2011·K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. We are, in this appeal, concerned with the legality of the direction given by a Division Bench of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital to the State Government to pay an amount of Rs.70,99,951.50 with interest to the respondents, placing reliance on an inter-departmental...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.