Ashish Ranjan vs Anupam Tandon
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
30 November, 2010·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging that the consent order dated 3.5.2008 passed by the Lok Adalat held by this Court has willfully and deliberately been violated by the respondents, as it has been ensured by them that the applicant may not r...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Steel Tubes Limited vs Ifci LimitedBharat Steel Tubes Limited Applicant/ vs Mr Manoranjan Sharma & Anr Alleged Contemnors
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph
30 November, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.29421 OF 2010BHARAT STEEL TUBES LIMITED … PETITIONER VERSUS IFCI LIMITED … RESPONDENTWITHCONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.271 OF 2010 INSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.29421 OF 2010BHA...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr Ashish Ranjan vs Dr Anupama Tandon & Anr Contemnors/
Judges: P Sathasivam, B S Chauhan
30 November, 2010·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging that the consent order dated 3.5.2008 passed by the Lok Adalat held by this Court has willfully and deliberately been violated by the respondents, as it has been ensured by them that the applicant may not r...
Supreme Court Of India
Arun Lal & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors (
Judges: Markandey Katju, T S Thakur
30 November, 2010·T.S. THAKUR, J.1. These appeals by special leave arise out of orders passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Allahabad whereby Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.43928 of 2002 filed by the respondent-Union of India has been allowed and order dated 3rd August, 2002 passed by the District Ju...
Supreme Court Of India
Special Land Acquisition Officer, Mysore Urban Development Authority vs Sakamma
Judges: R V Raveendran, P Sathasivam, A K Patnaik
30 November, 2010·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10182 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP(C) No.19058/2009] SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . APPELLANT Versus SAKAMMA RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10184 OF 2010 [Arising...
Supreme Court Of India
Spl.Laq Officer,Mysore ... vs Sakamma
Judges: R V Raveendran, P Sathasivam, A K Patnaik
30 November, 2010·Leave granted. Heard.2. 221 acres 20 guntas of land in Keragalli village, Mysore Taluk, including three acres of land belonging to the respondent in each of these two appeals were acquired for the Mysore Urban Development Authority for formation of layout under preliminary notification dated 15.7.19...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Bajaj Hindustan Ltd - vs - Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd & Anr
Judges: Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
29 November, 2010·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5856 of 2005 M/s. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. .. Appellant(s) -versus-Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. . .. Respondent(s) WITH SLP © No.1398 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.5857 of 2005 Civil A...
Supreme Court Of India
Amar Chakravarty & Ors — vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd —
Judges:
29 November, 2010·D.K. JAIN, J.:Leave granted.2. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the judgments delivered by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, whereby it dismissed the writ petitions of the appellants herein, holding that the Labour Court was correct in shifting the burden on the workmen- app...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Nicholas Piramal India Ltd vs Commnr Of Central Excise, Mumbai
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, Anil R Dave
29 November, 2010·Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.1. The short question which arises for determination in this Civil Appeal filed by the Assessee under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is whether “Vitamin A Acetate Crude” and “Vitamin A Palmitate” (hereinafter referred to as the product in question) or “Crude ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramala Sahkari Chini — Mills Ltd, U P vs Commissioner Central — Excise, Meerut-I
Judges:
29 November, 2010·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. Challenge in these civil appeals, filed under Section 35(L) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short “the Act”) is to the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”), inter alia, holding that welding electrodes ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.