Goan Real Estate & Construction Ltd & Anr vs Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Environment & Ors
Judges: J M Panchal
31 March, 2010·J.M. Panchal, J.1. By filing this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed to declare that the building plans sanctioned and constructions made and on- going constructions pursuant to the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification dated February 19, 1991 as amende...
Supreme Court Of India
Sunderlal Kanaiyalal Bhatija vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, H L Dattu
31 March, 2010·Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The issue that falls for consideration in the present appeal is whether the confessional statements recorded in a case relating to offences under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 [for short ‘TADA Act”] would be admissible in evidence against...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Anr vs C S Sidhu
Judges: Markandey Katju, A K Patnaik
31 March, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4474 OF 2005 Union of India & Anr. .... Appellants Versus C.S. Sidhu .... Respondent O R D E R Heard Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned Addl. Solicitor General appearing for the appellants.2. The...
Supreme Court Of India
Shamim Jahan vs Shambhu Prasad
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, C K Prasad
30 March, 2010·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18th April, 2008, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad reversing the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court as also by the trial Court. By the said judgment and decree, the suit of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Binod Mahato vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, C K Prasad
30 March, 2010·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court. The appellant, being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed against him directing him to suffer imprisonment for lif...
Supreme Court Of India
Patai @ Krishna Kumar vs State Of U P
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma, A K Patnaik
30 March, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1718 OF 2007 PATAI @ KRISHNA KUMAR …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF U.P. …RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1719 OF 2007 J U D G M E N T Dr. Mukundakam Sharma1. These two appeals ar...
Supreme Court Of India
Prem Chand & Ors vs Union Of India
Judges: V S Sirpurkar, Cyriac Joseph
30 March, 2010·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court wherein the High Court has awarded the land acquisition compensation @ Rs.39,300/- per bigha. The High Court relied on its earlier judgment without citing the same wherein it had fixed the land acqu...
Supreme Court Of India
Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs Randhir Singh & Ors
Judges: R V Raveendran
29 March, 2010·Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2811-2813 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP [C] Nos.6745-47/2009] Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh … Appellant Vs.Randhir Singh & Ors. … Respondents J U D G M E N T R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.Leave grante...
Supreme Court Of India
M D, M/S T Nadu Magnesite Ltd vs S Manickam & Ors W
Judges: B Sudershan Reddy, Surinder Singh Nijjar
29 March, 2010·SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J.1. Leave granted.2. By this judgment, we shall dispose of the above three appeals as the facts and the legal issues involved in all the appeals are common. The writ petitioners before the High Court have been impleaded as respondent No.1 before this Court.3. The appellant her...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramdas Athawale vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, S H Kapadia, R V Raveendran, B Sudershan Reddy, P Sathasivam
29 March, 2010·B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.This writ application under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by a Member of Lok Sabha, challenging the validity of the proceedings in the Lok Sakha commencing from 29th January, 2004 on the ground that the President has not addressed both Houses of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.