State Of U P vs Siya Ram & Anr
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, C K Prasad
05 August, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 792 OF 2003 STATE OF U.P. .. APPELLANT(S) vs.SIYA RAM & ANR. .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Three persons were sent for trial for an offence punishable under Section 307 read with Sec. 34 of the IP...
Supreme Court Of India
Vinaykishore Punamchandji ... vs Bhumi Kalptru and Ors
Judges: B Sudershan Reddy, Surinder Singh Nijjar
05 August, 2010·B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the final judgment and order dated 20th September, 2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 1206 of 1996 by the High Court of judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur whereby the High Court set aside the order dated...
Supreme Court Of India
Jayanta Sil vs State Of Assam
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, C K Prasad
04 August, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1345 OF 2007 JAYANTA SIL .. APPELLANT(S) vs.STATE OF ASSAM .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R This is a statutory appeal arising out of the judgment of the High Court dated 5th January, 2007.The pros...
Supreme Court Of India
Rafiq Khan vs State Of M P
Judges: C K Prasad
04 August, 2010·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 644 OF 2010 RAFIQ KHAN ..... APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF M.P. ..... RESPONDENT O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.It has been contended by learned counsel for the appellan...
Supreme Court Of India
Commnr.Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Tarpaulin International
Judges: D K Jain, H L Dattu
04 August, 2010·H.L. DATTU, J:ISSUE:These appeals, which are at the instance of the Commissioner of Central Excise, raise a common issue, viz., whether the tarpaulin made-ups which are prepared after cutting and stitching the tarpaulin fabric and fixing the eye-lets would involve the process of manufacture and, hen...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs M/S Tarpaulin InternationalCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs M/S Tarpaulin International & OrsCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs Rohini Mills Pvt LtdCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs Geotex Mills Pvt LtdCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs Bharat Textile Proofing Industries LtdCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai vs M/S Pondicherry Water Proofers EtcCommissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-Ii Commissionerate vs F Harley And Company
Judges: D K Jain, H L Dattu
04 August, 2010·H.L. DATTU, J:ISSUE:These appeals, which are at the instance of the Commissioner of Central Excise, raise a common issue, viz., whether the tarpaulin made-ups which are prepared after cutting and stitching the tarpaulin fabric and fixing the eye-lets would involve the process of manufacture...
Supreme Court Of India
Mukeshbhai Gopalbhai Barot vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, C K Prasad
04 August, 2010·We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.Vide our separate reasoned order, we have allowed this appeal. As per the counsel, the appellant is stated to be in jail. The appellant shall be set at liberty forthwith if not required in connection with any other case.The reasoned order to ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ms Vsk Enterprises vs M/S Shiva Steels
Judges: Altamas Kabir, A K Patnaik
04 August, 2010·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C) NO.25144 OF 2009Ms. V.K. Enterprises … Petitioner Vs.M/s. Shiva Steels … Respondent J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. The short point involved in this Special Leave Petition is whethe...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S V.K.Enterprises and Anr vs M/S Shiva Steels
Judges: Altamas Kabir, A K Patnaik
04 August, 2010·ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. The short point involved in this Special Leave Petition is whether the learned District and Sessions Judge, Delhi, had rightly dismissed the Petitioner's application under Order XXXVII Rule 3, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil 2 Procedure (C.P.C.) for leave to defend the...
Supreme Court Of India
Karuba Nallapppagari vs State Of A P
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, C K Prasad
03 August, 2010·1. The only argument made by the learned counsel is with regard to the quantum of sentence.2. The accused appellant stands charged for offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for having raped a girl aged about 9 years. P.W. 2, the victim appeared in the witness box and gave a...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.